diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | 34 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp index f2fad825c3e..4e39d067547 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp @@ -401,18 +401,18 @@ bool Sema::isNonTypeNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec &SS, isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS); Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange()); } - + if (LookupCtx) { // Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we // computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access // expression or the declaration context associated with a prior // nested-name-specifier. - + // The declaration context must be complete. if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() && RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx)) return false; - + LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx); } else if (isDependent) { return false; @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ bool Sema::isNonTypeNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec &SS, LookupName(Found, S); } Found.suppressDiagnostics(); - + return Found.getAsSingle<NamespaceDecl>(); } @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, NestedNameSpecInfo &IdInfo, = TLB.push<UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc>(T); UnresolvedTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc); } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(T)) { - SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL + SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL = TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T); TL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc); } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType>(T)) { @@ -772,11 +772,11 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, NestedNameSpecInfo &IdInfo, } // In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't - // resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have - // the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation. + // resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have + // the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation. // The goal is to be able to resolve a function call whose // nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class. - // Example: + // Example: // // class C { // public: @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifierDecltype(CXXScopeSpec &SS, return true; if (!T->isDependentType() && !T->getAs<TagType>()) { - Diag(DS.getTypeSpecTypeLoc(), diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace) + Diag(DS.getTypeSpecTypeLoc(), diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace) << T << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus; return true; } @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, bool EnteringContext) { if (SS.isInvalid()) return true; - + // Translate the parser's template argument list in our AST format. TemplateArgumentListInfo TemplateArgs(LAngleLoc, RAngleLoc); translateTemplateArguments(TemplateArgsIn, TemplateArgs); @@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, DTN->getQualifier(), DTN->getIdentifier(), TemplateArgs); - + // Create source-location information for this type. TypeLocBuilder Builder; DependentTemplateSpecializationTypeLoc SpecTL @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, SpecTL.setRAngleLoc(RAngleLoc); for (unsigned I = 0, N = TemplateArgs.size(); I != N; ++I) SpecTL.setArgLocInfo(I, TemplateArgs[I].getLocInfo()); - + SS.Extend(Context, TemplateKWLoc, Builder.getTypeLocInContext(Context, T), CCLoc); return false; @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, return true; } - // We were able to resolve the template name to an actual template. + // We were able to resolve the template name to an actual template. // Build an appropriate nested-name-specifier. QualType T = CheckTemplateIdType(Template.get(), TemplateNameLoc, TemplateArgs); @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, namespace { /// A structure that stores a nested-name-specifier annotation, - /// including both the nested-name-specifier + /// including both the nested-name-specifier struct NestedNameSpecifierAnnotation { NestedNameSpecifier *NNS; }; @@ -991,14 +991,14 @@ void *Sema::SaveNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(CXXScopeSpec &SS) { return Annotation; } -void Sema::RestoreNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(void *AnnotationPtr, +void Sema::RestoreNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(void *AnnotationPtr, SourceRange AnnotationRange, CXXScopeSpec &SS) { if (!AnnotationPtr) { SS.SetInvalid(AnnotationRange); return; } - + NestedNameSpecifierAnnotation *Annotation = static_cast<NestedNameSpecifierAnnotation *>(AnnotationPtr); SS.Adopt(NestedNameSpecifierLoc(Annotation->NNS, Annotation + 1)); @@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ bool Sema::ActOnCXXEnterDeclaratorScope(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec &SS) { // it is a complete declaration context. if (!DC->isDependentContext() && RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, DC)) return true; - + EnterDeclaratorContext(S, DC); // Rebuild the nested name specifier for the new scope. |