diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html | 44 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html index 306ba767a96..e5f17679e33 100644 --- a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html +++ b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html @@ -97,23 +97,23 @@ <h3>Comments about the issues</h3> <ul> <li>2181 - </li> -<li>2309 - </li> -<li>2310 - </li> -<li>2328 - </li> +<li>2309 - I don't think there's anything to do here.</li> +<li>2310 - I think we need a test that checks array::data() == addressof(front()). Other than that, we're good.</li> +<li>2328 - <istream>:1467 - fix is straightforward. Need to think about tests.</li> <li>2393 - </li> -<li>2426 - </li> -<li>2436 - </li> -<li>2441 - </li> -<li>2451 - </li> -<li>2509 - </li> -<li>2516 - </li> -<li>2542 - </li> -<li>2549 - </li> -<li>2550 - </li> -<li>2551 - </li> -<li>2555 - </li> +<li>2426 - I believe this is just a wording clarification, but need to study it some more.</li> +<li>2436 - Adds Requirements on compare/hasher. We can static_assert this, and test it.</li> +<li>2441 - Looks straightforward.</li> +<li>2451 - <i>Significant work.</i></li> +<li>2509 - <i>Significant work.</i></li> +<li>2516 - We don't have an observer_ptr implementation yet.</li> +<li>2542 - This is probably mostly writing additional tests.</li> +<li>2549 - Tuple EXPLICIT - Eric?</li> +<li>2550 - Wording clarification; no code change needed.</li> +<li>2551 - Wording cleanup; no code change needed.</li> +<li>2555 - Wording clarification; no code change needed.</li> <li>2573 - </li> -<li>2596 - </li> +<li>2596 - Easy.</li> <li>2667 - </li> <li>2669 - </li> <li>2670 - </li> @@ -121,17 +121,17 @@ <li>2673 - </li> <li>2674 - </li> <li>2683 - </li> -<li>2684 - </li> -<li>2685 - </li> -<li>2688 - </li> -<li>2689 - </li> -<li>2698 - </li> +<li>2684 - We already have one; just need to add a test for it (in test/std/containers/container.adaptors/priority.queue/types.pass.cpp)</li> +<li>2685 - Wording clarification; no code change needed. We don't handle throwing move ctors here anyway.</li> +<li>2688 - I believe that we already do this.</li> +<li>2689 - We don't have a parallel implementation yet (though I'm working on it).</li> +<li>2698 - Wording clarification; no code change needed.</li> <li>2706 - </li> <li>2707 - </li> -<li>2710 - </li> +<li>2710 - Wording cleanup; no code change needed.</li> </ul> -<p>Last Updated: 31-May-2016</p> +<p>Last Updated: 7-Jun-2016</p> </div> </body> </html> |
