[x86] Fix a bug in r216319 where I was missing a 'break'.

This actually was caught by existing tests but those tests were disabled
with an XFAIL because of PR20736. While working on fixing that,
I noticed the test failure, and tracked it down to this.

We even have a really nice Clang warning that would have caught this but
it isn't enabled in LLVM! =[ I may look at enabling it.

llvm-svn: 216391

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 66c00fb3507..5dd542842e4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -19467,11 +19467,13 @@ combineRedundantDWordShuffle(SDValue N, MutableArrayRef<int> Mask,
     case X86ISD::UNPCKL:
     case X86ISD::UNPCKH:
       V = DAG.getNode(W.getOpcode(), DL, W.getValueType(), V, V);
+      break;
 
     case X86ISD::PSHUFD:
     case X86ISD::PSHUFLW:
     case X86ISD::PSHUFHW:
       V = DAG.getNode(W.getOpcode(), DL, W.getValueType(), V, W.getOperand(1));
+      break;
     }
   }
   if (V.getValueType() != N.getValueType())