Attempt to unbreak buidlbot lld-x86_64-darwin13 after r342555.

The reason why build #25777 might have failed is because the SmallVector move
constructor is _not_ noexcept, and the stl implementation used by that buildbot
calls _VSTD::move_if_noexcept() (according to the backtrace).

OpcodeInfo has a default move constructor, and the copy constructor is deleted.
However, as far as I can see, SmallVector doesn't declare a noexcept move
constructor. So, what I believe it is happening here is that,
_VSTD::move_if_noexcept() returns an lvalue reference and not an rvalue
reference.
This eventually triggers a copy that fails to compile.

Hopefully, using a std::vector instead of SmallVector (as it was originally
suggested by Simon in the code review) should be enough to unbreak the buildbot.

llvm-svn: 342561

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.h b/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.h
index ef2b32c37c4..3ed753c8ffe 100644
--- a/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.h
+++ b/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.h
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct PredicateInfo {
 /// There is at least one OpcodeInfo object for every opcode specified by a
 /// TIPredicate definition.
 class OpcodeInfo {
-  llvm::SmallVector<PredicateInfo, 8> Predicates;
+  std::vector<PredicateInfo> Predicates;
 
   OpcodeInfo(const OpcodeInfo &Other) = delete;
   OpcodeInfo &operator=(const OpcodeInfo &Other) = delete;