diff options
author | Alina Sbirlea <asbirlea@google.com> | 2019-06-11 18:27:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alina Sbirlea <asbirlea@google.com> | 2019-06-11 18:27:49 +0000 |
commit | 3cef1f7d64f29fab5c8d0ce9abf0fa98c75a3c10 (patch) | |
tree | a0454831a68aedf8228db5bc20d91302a5f1c084 /llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp | |
parent | e20865c387e09ea0ebd5add15c762cd5271ff65f (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-3cef1f7d64f29fab5c8d0ce9abf0fa98c75a3c10.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-3cef1f7d64f29fab5c8d0ce9abf0fa98c75a3c10.zip |
Only passes that preserve MemorySSA must mark it as preserved.
Summary:
The method `getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses` should not mark MemorySSA as
preserved, because it's being called in a lot of passes that do not
preserve MemorySSA.
Instead, mark the MemorySSA analysis as preserved by each pass that does
preserve it.
These changes only affect the new pass mananger.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62536
llvm-svn: 363091
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp | 12 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp index 0743cba852d..5eb8101a3df 100644 --- a/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp +++ b/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp @@ -396,11 +396,13 @@ TEST_F(LoopPassManagerTest, FunctionPassInvalidationOfLoopAnalyses) { // No need to re-run if we require again from a fresh loop pass manager. FPM.addPass(createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor( RequireAnalysisLoopPass<MockLoopAnalysisHandle::Analysis>())); - // For 'f', preserve most things but not the specific loop analyses. + auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); + if (EnableMSSALoopDependency) + PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>(); EXPECT_CALL(MFPHandle, run(HasName("f"), _)) .InSequence(FSequence) - .WillOnce(Return(getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses())); + .WillOnce(Return(PA)); EXPECT_CALL(MLAHandle, invalidate(HasName("loop.0.0"), _, _)) .InSequence(FSequence) .WillOnce(DoDefault()); @@ -475,6 +477,8 @@ TEST_F(LoopPassManagerTest, ModulePassInvalidationOfLoopAnalyses) { EXPECT_CALL(MMPHandle, run(_, _)).WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs([] { auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); + if (EnableMSSALoopDependency) + PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>(); return PA; })); // All the loop analyses from both functions get invalidated before we @@ -803,6 +807,8 @@ TEST_F(LoopPassManagerTest, IndirectOuterPassInvalidation) { // the fact that they were preserved. EXPECT_CALL(MFPHandle, run(HasName("f"), _)).WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs([] { auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); + if (EnableMSSALoopDependency) + PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>(); PA.preserveSet<AllAnalysesOn<Loop>>(); return PA; })); @@ -824,6 +830,8 @@ TEST_F(LoopPassManagerTest, IndirectOuterPassInvalidation) { // Which means that no extra invalidation occurs and cached values are used. EXPECT_CALL(MFPHandle, run(HasName("g"), _)).WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs([] { auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); + if (EnableMSSALoopDependency) + PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>(); PA.preserveSet<AllAnalysesOn<Loop>>(); return PA; })); |