Revert "[BPI] Use a safer constructor to calculate branch probabilities"

This reverts commit r290016. It breaks this bot, even though the test
passes locally:

  http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/32956/

AnalysisTests: /home/bb/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/BranchProbability.cpp:52: static llvm::BranchProbability llvm::BranchProbability::getBranchProbability(uint64_t, uint64_t): Assertion `Numerator <= Denominator && "Probability cannot be bigger than 1!"' failed.
llvm-svn: 290019

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 88 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index cbf8b50c762..00000000000
--- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-//===- BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp - BranchProbabilityInfo unit tests ---===//
-//
-//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
-#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
-#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
-#include "gtest/gtest.h"
-
-namespace llvm {
-namespace {
-
-struct BranchProbabilityInfoTest : public testing::Test {
-  std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI;
-  std::unique_ptr<DominatorTree> DT;
-  std::unique_ptr<LoopInfo> LI;
-  LLVMContext C;
-
-  BranchProbabilityInfo &buildBPI(Function &F) {
-    DT.reset(new DominatorTree(F));
-    LI.reset(new LoopInfo(*DT));
-    BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, *LI));
-    return *BPI;
-  }
-
-  std::unique_ptr<Module> makeLLVMModule() {
-    const char *ModuleString = "define void @f() { exit: ret void }\n";
-    SMDiagnostic Err;
-    return parseAssemblyString(ModuleString, Err, C);
-  }
-};
-
-TEST_F(BranchProbabilityInfoTest, StressUnreachableHeuristic) {
-  auto M = makeLLVMModule();
-  Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
-
-  // define void @f() {
-  // entry:
-  //   switch i32 undef, label %exit, [
-  //      i32 0, label %preexit
-  //      ...                   ;;< Add lots of cases to stress the heuristic.
-  //   ]
-  // preexit:
-  //   unreachable
-  // exit:
-  //   ret void
-  // }
-
-  auto *ExitBB = &F->back();
-  auto *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(C, "entry", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
-
-  auto *PreExitBB =
-      BasicBlock::Create(C, "preexit", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
-  new UnreachableInst(C, PreExitBB);
-
-  unsigned NumCases = 4096;
-  auto *I32 = IntegerType::get(C, 32);
-  auto *Undef = UndefValue::get(I32);
-  auto *Switch = SwitchInst::Create(Undef, ExitBB, NumCases, EntryBB);
-  for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumCases; ++I)
-    Switch->addCase(ConstantInt::get(I32, I), PreExitBB);
-
-  BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = buildBPI(*F);
-
-  // FIXME: This doesn't seem optimal. Since all of the cases handled by the
-  // switch have the *same* destination block ("preexit"), shouldn't it be the
-  // hot one? I'd expect the results to be reversed here...
-  EXPECT_FALSE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, PreExitBB));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, ExitBB));
-}
-
-} // end anonymous namespace
-} // end namespace llvm