Verifier: Remove the separate -verify-di pass

Remove `DebugInfoVerifierLegacyPass` and the `-verify-di` pass.
Instead, call into the `DebugInfoVerifier` from inside
`VerifierLegacyPass::finalizeModule()`.  This better matches the logic
in `verifyModule()` (used by the new PassManager), avoids requiring two
separate passes to verify the IR, and makes the API for "add a pass to
verify the IR" simple.

Note: the `-verify-debug-info` flag still works (for now, at least;
eventually it might make sense to just remove it).

llvm-svn: 232772

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp b/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp
index 6c27c1ecbbf..c1e120af540 100644
--- a/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp
+++ b/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp
@@ -185,10 +185,8 @@ static inline void addPass(legacy::PassManagerBase &PM, Pass *P) {
   PM.add(P);
 
   // If we are verifying all of the intermediate steps, add the verifier...
-  if (VerifyEach) {
+  if (VerifyEach)
     PM.add(createVerifierPass());
-    PM.add(createDebugInfoVerifierPass());
-  }
 }
 
 /// This routine adds optimization passes based on selected optimization level,
@@ -198,8 +196,7 @@ static inline void addPass(legacy::PassManagerBase &PM, Pass *P) {
 static void AddOptimizationPasses(legacy::PassManagerBase &MPM,
                                   legacy::FunctionPassManager &FPM,
                                   unsigned OptLevel, unsigned SizeLevel) {
-  FPM.add(createVerifierPass());          // Verify that input is correct
-  MPM.add(createDebugInfoVerifierPass()); // Verify that debug info is correct
+  FPM.add(createVerifierPass()); // Verify that input is correct
 
   PassManagerBuilder Builder;
   Builder.OptLevel = OptLevel;
@@ -558,10 +555,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
   }
 
   // Check that the module is well formed on completion of optimization
-  if (!NoVerify && !VerifyEach) {
+  if (!NoVerify && !VerifyEach)
     Passes.add(createVerifierPass());
-    Passes.add(createDebugInfoVerifierPass());
-  }
 
   // Write bitcode or assembly to the output as the last step...
   if (!NoOutput && !AnalyzeOnly) {