Add support for the notion of "hidden" relocations. On MachO, these are relocation entries that are used as additional information for other, real relocations, rather than being relocations themselves.

I'm not familiar enough with ELF or COFF to know if they should have any relocations marked hidden.

llvm-svn: 142961

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp b/llvm/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
index c2480df1415..c0486defa5e 100644
--- a/llvm/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
+++ b/llvm/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
@@ -301,9 +301,15 @@ static void DisassembleObject(const ObjectFile *Obj, bool InlineRelocs) {
 
         // Print relocation for instruction.
         while (rel_cur != rel_end) {
+          bool hidden = false;
           uint64_t addr;
           SmallString<16> name;
           SmallString<32> val;
+
+          // If this relocation is hidden, skip it.
+          if (error(rel_cur->getHidden(hidden))) goto skip_print_rel;
+          if (hidden) goto skip_print_rel;
+
           if (error(rel_cur->getAddress(addr))) goto skip_print_rel;
           // Stop when rel_cur's address is past the current instruction.
           if (addr >= Index + Size) break;
@@ -336,9 +342,12 @@ static void PrintRelocations(const ObjectFile *o) {
                              ri != re; ri.increment(ec)) {
       if (error(ec)) return;
 
+      bool hidden;
       uint64_t address;
       SmallString<32> relocname;
       SmallString<32> valuestr;
+      if (error(ri->getHidden(hidden))) continue;
+      if (hidden) continue;
       if (error(ri->getTypeName(relocname))) continue;
       if (error(ri->getAddress(address))) continue;
       if (error(ri->getValueString(valuestr))) continue;