diff options
| author | Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> | 2014-06-16 16:55:20 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> | 2014-06-16 16:55:20 +0000 |
| commit | fff5663d4864a20633b3f86efb2b437de54a4dc7 (patch) | |
| tree | f36f5d73fcce8834762b5c71833215c2bd5fa96d /llvm/test | |
| parent | f6419cfb143dc6fb4f5919ec74d65d187f6bbf7b (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-fff5663d4864a20633b3f86efb2b437de54a4dc7.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-fff5663d4864a20633b3f86efb2b437de54a4dc7.zip | |
LowerSwitch: track bounding range for the condition tree.
When LowerSwitch transforms a switch instruction into a tree of ifs it
is actually performing a binary search into the various case ranges, to
see if the current value falls into one cases range of values.
So, if we have a program with something like this:
switch (a) {
case 0:
do0();
break;
case 1:
do1();
break;
case 2:
do2();
break;
default:
break;
}
the code produced is something like this:
if (a < 1) {
if (a == 0) {
do0();
}
} else {
if (a < 2) {
if (a == 1) {
do1();
}
} else {
if (a == 2) {
do2();
}
}
}
This code is inefficient because the check (a == 1) to execute do1() is
not needed.
The reason is that because we already checked that (a >= 1) initially by
checking that also (a < 2) we basically already inferred that (a == 1)
without the need of an extra basic block spawned to check if actually (a
== 1).
The patch addresses this problem by keeping track of already
checked bounds in the LowerSwitch algorithm, so that when the time
arrives to produce a Leaf Block that checks the equality with the case
value / range the algorithm can decide if that block is really needed
depending on the already checked bounds .
For example, the above with "a = 1" would work like this:
the bounds start as LB: NONE , UB: NONE
as (a < 1) is emitted the bounds for the else path become LB: 1 UB:
NONE. This happens because by failing the test (a < 1) we know that the
value "a" cannot be smaller than 1 if we enter the else branch.
After the emitting the check (a < 2) the bounds in the if branch become
LB: 1 UB: 1. This is because by checking that "a" is smaller than 2 then
the upper bound becomes 2 - 1 = 1.
When it is time to emit the leaf block for "case 1:" we notice that 1
can be squeezed exactly in between the LB and UB, which means that if we
arrived to that block there is no need to emit a block that checks if (a
== 1).
Patch by: Marcello Maggioni <hayarms@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 211038
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/test')
3 files changed, 107 insertions, 75 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-10-SwitchContiguousOpt.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-10-SwitchContiguousOpt.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3673c04a8b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-10-SwitchContiguousOpt.ll @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -S | FileCheck %s +; CHECK-NOT: icmp eq i32 %0, 1 + +define i32 @foo(i32 %a) #0 { +entry: + %retval = alloca i32, align 4 + %a.addr = alloca i32, align 4 + store i32 %a, i32* %a.addr, align 4 + %0 = load i32* %a.addr, align 4 + switch i32 %0, label %sw.default [ + i32 0, label %sw.bb + i32 1, label %sw.bb1 + i32 2, label %sw.bb2 + ] + +sw.bb: + ret i32 12 + +sw.bb1: + ret i32 4 + +sw.bb2: + ret i32 2 + +sw.default: + ret i32 9 +} diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-11-SwitchDefaultUnreachableOpt.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-11-SwitchDefaultUnreachableOpt.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0f737211f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2014-06-11-SwitchDefaultUnreachableOpt.ll @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -S | FileCheck %s +; CHECK-NOT: {{.*}}icmp eq{{.*}} +; +;int foo(int a) { +; +; switch (a) { +; case 0: +; return 10; +; case 1: +; return 3; +; default: +; __builtin_unreachable(); +; } +; +;} + +define i32 @foo(i32 %a) nounwind ssp uwtable { + %1 = alloca i32, align 4 + %2 = alloca i32, align 4 + store i32 %a, i32* %2, align 4 + %3 = load i32* %2, align 4 + switch i32 %3, label %6 [ + i32 0, label %4 + i32 1, label %5 + ] + +; <label>:4 + store i32 10, i32* %1 + br label %7 + +; <label>:5 + store i32 3, i32* %1 + br label %7 + +; <label>:6 + unreachable + +; <label>:7 + %8 = load i32* %1 + ret i32 %8 +} diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll index e85f03ee5c7..09d25f0b06d 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll @@ -3,93 +3,57 @@ ; We have switch on input. ; On output we should got binary comparison tree. Check that all is fine. -;CHECK: entry: -;CHECK-NEXT: br label %NodeBlock37 +;CHECK: entry: +;CHECK-NEXT: br label %NodeBlock19 -;CHECK: NodeBlock37: ; preds = %entry -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot38 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 10 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot38, label %NodeBlock13, label %NodeBlock35 +;CHECK: NodeBlock19: ; preds = %entry +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot20 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 10 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot20, label %NodeBlock5, label %NodeBlock17 -;CHECK: NodeBlock35: ; preds = %NodeBlock37 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot36 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 13 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot36, label %NodeBlock23, label %NodeBlock33 +;CHECK: NodeBlock17: ; preds = %NodeBlock19 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot18 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 13 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot18, label %NodeBlock9, label %NodeBlock15 -;CHECK: NodeBlock33: ; preds = %NodeBlock35 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot34 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 14 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot34, label %LeafBlock25, label %NodeBlock31 +;CHECK: NodeBlock15: ; preds = %NodeBlock17 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot16 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 14 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot16, label %bb330, label %NodeBlock13 -;CHECK: NodeBlock31: ; preds = %NodeBlock33 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot32 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 15 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot32, label %LeafBlock27, label %LeafBlock29 +;CHECK: NodeBlock13: ; preds = %NodeBlock15 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot14 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 15 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot14, label %bb332, label %LeafBlock11 -;CHECK: LeafBlock29: ; preds = %NodeBlock31 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf30 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 15 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf30, label %bb334, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: LeafBlock11: ; preds = %NodeBlock13 +;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf12 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 15 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf12, label %bb334, label %NewDefault -;CHECK: LeafBlock27: ; preds = %NodeBlock31 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf28 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 14 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf28, label %bb332, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: NodeBlock9: ; preds = %NodeBlock17 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot10 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 11 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot10, label %bb324, label %NodeBlock7 -;CHECK: LeafBlock25: ; preds = %NodeBlock33 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf26 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 13 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf26, label %bb330, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: NodeBlock7: ; preds = %NodeBlock9 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot8 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 12 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot8, label %bb326, label %bb328 -;CHECK: NodeBlock23: ; preds = %NodeBlock35 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot24 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 11 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot24, label %LeafBlock15, label %NodeBlock21 +;CHECK: NodeBlock5: ; preds = %NodeBlock19 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot6 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 7 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot6, label %NodeBlock, label %NodeBlock3 -;CHECK: NodeBlock21: ; preds = %NodeBlock23 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot22 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 12 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot22, label %LeafBlock17, label %LeafBlock19 +;CHECK: NodeBlock3: ; preds = %NodeBlock5 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot4 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 8 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot4, label %bb, label %NodeBlock1 -;CHECK: LeafBlock19: ; preds = %NodeBlock21 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf20 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 12 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf20, label %bb328, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: NodeBlock1: ; preds = %NodeBlock3 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot2 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 9 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot2, label %bb338, label %bb322 -;CHECK: LeafBlock17: ; preds = %NodeBlock21 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf18 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 11 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf18, label %bb326, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: NodeBlock: ; preds = %NodeBlock5 +;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 0 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot, label %LeafBlock, label %bb338 -;CHECK: LeafBlock15: ; preds = %NodeBlock23 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf16 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 10 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf16, label %bb324, label %NewDefault - -;CHECK: NodeBlock13: ; preds = %NodeBlock37 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot14 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 7 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot14, label %NodeBlock, label %NodeBlock11 - -;CHECK: NodeBlock11: ; preds = %NodeBlock13 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot12 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 8 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot12, label %LeafBlock3, label %NodeBlock9 - -;CHECK: NodeBlock9: ; preds = %NodeBlock11 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot10 = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 9 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot10, label %LeafBlock5, label %LeafBlock7 - -;CHECK: LeafBlock7: ; preds = %NodeBlock9 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf8 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 9 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf8, label %bb322, label %NewDefault - -;CHECK: LeafBlock5: ; preds = %NodeBlock9 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf6 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 8 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf6, label %bb338, label %NewDefault - -;CHECK: LeafBlock3: ; preds = %NodeBlock11 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf4 = icmp eq i32 %tmp158, 7 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf4, label %bb, label %NewDefault - -;CHECK: NodeBlock: ; preds = %NodeBlock13 -;CHECK-NEXT: %Pivot = icmp slt i32 %tmp158, 0 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %Pivot, label %LeafBlock, label %LeafBlock1 - -;CHECK: LeafBlock1: ; preds = %NodeBlock -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf2 = icmp ule i32 %tmp158, 6 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf2, label %bb338, label %NewDefault - -;CHECK: LeafBlock: ; preds = %NodeBlock -;CHECK-NEXT: %tmp158.off = add i32 %tmp158, 6 -;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf = icmp ule i32 %tmp158.off, 4 -;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf, label %bb338, label %NewDefault +;CHECK: LeafBlock: ; preds = %NodeBlock +;CHECK-NEXT: %tmp158.off = add i32 %tmp158, 6 +;CHECK-NEXT: %SwitchLeaf = icmp ule i32 %tmp158.off, 4 +;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %SwitchLeaf, label %bb338, label %NewDefault define i32 @main(i32 %tmp158) { entry: |

