diff options
| author | Max Kazantsev <max.kazantsev@azul.com> | 2017-04-17 09:52:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Max Kazantsev <max.kazantsev@azul.com> | 2017-04-17 09:52:02 +0000 |
| commit | 751579cac0cf426a72d29c5959b5bb8236c7f0fb (patch) | |
| tree | 628779bc3090006114235eccb706602288b97104 /llvm/test | |
| parent | 5f72e056e712866b0b58c03fe8c599b12529ccbd (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-751579cac0cf426a72d29c5959b5bb8236c7f0fb.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-751579cac0cf426a72d29c5959b5bb8236c7f0fb.zip | |
[LoopPeeling] Get rid of Phis that become invariant after N steps
This patch is a generalization of the improvement introduced in rL296898.
Previously, we were able to peel one iteration of a loop to get rid of a Phi that becomes
an invariant on the 2nd iteration. In more general case, if a Phi becomes invariant after
N iterations, we can peel N times and turn it into invariant.
In order to do this, we for every Phi in loop's header we define the Invariant Depth value
which is calculated as follows:
Given %x = phi <Inputs from above the loop>, ..., [%y, %back.edge].
If %y is a loop invariant, then Depth(%x) = 1.
If %y is a Phi from the loop header, Depth(%x) = Depth(%y) + 1.
Otherwise, Depth(%x) is infinite.
Notice that if we peel a loop, all Phis with Depth = 1 become invariants,
and all other Phis with finite depth decrease the depth by 1.
Thus, peeling N first iterations allows us to turn all Phis with Depth <= N
into invariants.
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, mkuper, skatkov, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31613
llvm-svn: 300446
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll | 149 |
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll index c3cbbf1ca0c..8691481acc1 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-threshold=8 | FileCheck %s +; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-threshold=30 | FileCheck %s define i32 @invariant_backedge_1(i32 %a, i32 %b) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_1 @@ -25,10 +25,112 @@ exit: ret i32 %sum } -; Peeling should fail due to method size. define i32 @invariant_backedge_2(i32 %a, i32 %b) { +; This loop should be peeled twice because it has a Phi which becomes invariant +; starting from 3rd iteration. ; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_2 -; CHECK-NOT: loop.peel: +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: %i = phi +; CHECK: %sum = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %half.inv = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %plus = phi +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: + %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] + %sum = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %incsum, %loop ] + %half.inv = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %loop ] + %plus = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %half.inv, %loop ] + + %incsum = add i32 %sum, %plus + %inc = add i32 %i, 1 + %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000 + + br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %sum +} + +define i32 @invariant_backedge_3(i32 %a, i32 %b) { +; This loop should be peeled thrice because it has a Phi which becomes invariant +; starting from 4th iteration. +; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_3 +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: %i = phi +; CHECK: %sum = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %half.inv = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %half.inv.2 = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %plus = phi +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: + %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] + %sum = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %incsum, %loop ] + %half.inv = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %loop ] + %half.inv.2 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %half.inv, %loop ] + %plus = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %half.inv.2, %loop ] + + %incsum = add i32 %sum, %plus + %inc = add i32 %i, 1 + %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000 + + br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %sum +} + +define i32 @invariant_backedge_limited_by_size(i32 %a, i32 %b) { +; This loop should normally be peeled thrice because it has a Phi which becomes +; invariant starting from 4th iteration, but the size of the loop only allows +; us to peel twice because we are restricted to 30 instructions in resulting +; code. Thus, %plus Phi node should stay in loop even despite its backedge +; input is an invariant. +; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_limited_by_size +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: %i = phi +; CHECK: %sum = phi +; CHECK: %plus = phi i32 [ %a, {{.*}} ], [ %b, %loop ] +; CHECK-NOT: %half.inv = phi +; CHECK-NOT: %half.inv.2 = phi +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: + %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] + %sum = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %incsum, %loop ] + %half.inv = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %loop ] + %half.inv.2 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %half.inv, %loop ] + %plus = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %half.inv.2, %loop ] + + %incsum = add i32 %sum, %plus + %inc = add i32 %i, 1 + %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000 + + %incsum2 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum3 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum4 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum5 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum6 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum7 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + + br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %sum +} + +; Peeling should fail due to method size. +define i32 @invariant_backedge_negative(i32 %a, i32 %b) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_negative +; CHECK-NOT: loop.peel{{.*}}: ; CHECK: loop: ; CHECK: %i = phi ; CHECK: %sum = phi @@ -43,6 +145,47 @@ loop: %incsum = add i32 %sum, %plus %incsum2 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum3 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum4 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum5 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum6 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum7 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum8 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum9 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum10 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum11 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum12 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum13 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum14 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %incsum15 = add i32 %incsum, %plus + %inc = add i32 %i, 1 + %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000 + + br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %sum +} + +define i32 @cycled_phis(i32 %a, i32 %b) { +; Make sure that we do not crash working with cycled Phis and don't peel it. +; TODO: Actually this loop should be partially unrolled with factor 2. +; CHECK-LABEL: @cycled_phis +; CHECK-NOT: loop.peel{{.*}}: +; CHECK: loop: +; CHECK: %i = phi +; CHECK: %phi.a = phi +; CHECK: %phi.b = phi +; CHECK: %sum = phi +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: + %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] + %phi.a = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.b, %loop ] + %phi.b = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %phi.a, %loop ] + %sum = phi i32 [ 0, %entry], [ %incsum, %loop ] + %incsum = add i32 %sum, %phi.a %inc = add i32 %i, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000 |

