PR9420; an instruction before an unreachable is guaranteed not to have any

reachable uses, but there still might be uses in dead blocks.  Use the
standard solution of replacing all the uses with undef.  This is
a rare case because it's very sensitive to phase ordering in SimplifyCFG.

llvm-svn: 127299

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/2011-03-08-UnreachableUse.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/2011-03-08-UnreachableUse.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..329774e2242
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/2011-03-08-UnreachableUse.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
+; PR9420
+
+; Note that the crash in PR9420 test is sensitive to the ordering of
+; the transformations done by SimplifyCFG, so this test is likely to rot
+; quickly.
+
+define noalias i8* @func_29() nounwind {
+; CHECK: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
+entry:
+  br label %for.cond
+
+for.cond:                                         ; preds = %for.inc38, %entry
+  %p_34.addr.0 = phi i16 [ 1, %entry ], [ %conv40, %for.inc38 ]
+  br label %for.cond1
+
+for.cond1:                                        ; preds = %for.inc29, %for.cond
+  %p_32.addr.0 = phi i1 [ true, %for.cond ], [ true, %for.inc29 ]
+  br i1 %p_32.addr.0, label %for.body8, label %for.inc38
+
+for.body8:                                        ; preds = %for.cond1
+  unreachable
+
+for.inc29:                                        ; preds = %for.cond17
+  br label %for.cond1
+
+for.inc38:                                        ; preds = %for.end32
+  %conv40 = add i16 %p_34.addr.0, 1
+  br label %for.cond
+}