Fix several accidental DOS line endings in source files

Summary:
There are a number of files in the tree which have been accidentally checked in with DOS line endings.  Convert these to native line endings.

There are also a few files which have DOS line endings on purpose, and I have set the svn:eol-style property to 'CRLF' on those.

Reviewers: joerg, aaron.ballman

Subscribers: aaron.ballman, sanjoy, dsanders, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15848

llvm-svn: 256707

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/statepoint-coreclr.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/statepoint-coreclr.ll
index dc468966877..0228549025e 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/statepoint-coreclr.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/statepoint-coreclr.ll
@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
-; RUN: opt %s -S -place-safepoints | FileCheck %s

-

-; Basic test to make sure that safepoints are placed

-; for CoreCLR GC

-

-declare void @foo()

-

-define void @test_simple_call() gc "coreclr" {

-; CHECK-LABEL: test_simple_call

-entry:

-  br label %other

-other:

-; CHECK-LABEL: other

-; CHECK: statepoint

-; CHECK-NOT: gc.result

-  call void @foo()

-  ret void

-}

-

-; This function is inlined when inserting a poll.  To avoid recursive

-; issues, make sure we don't place safepoints in it.

-declare void @do_safepoint()

-define void @gc.safepoint_poll() {

-; CHECK-LABEL: gc.safepoint_poll

-; CHECK-LABEL: entry

-; CHECK-NEXT: do_safepoint

-; CHECK-NEXT: ret void

-entry:

-  call void @do_safepoint()

-  ret void

-}

+; RUN: opt %s -S -place-safepoints | FileCheck %s
+
+; Basic test to make sure that safepoints are placed
+; for CoreCLR GC
+
+declare void @foo()
+
+define void @test_simple_call() gc "coreclr" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_simple_call
+entry:
+  br label %other
+other:
+; CHECK-LABEL: other
+; CHECK: statepoint
+; CHECK-NOT: gc.result
+  call void @foo()
+  ret void
+}
+
+; This function is inlined when inserting a poll.  To avoid recursive
+; issues, make sure we don't place safepoints in it.
+declare void @do_safepoint()
+define void @gc.safepoint_poll() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: gc.safepoint_poll
+; CHECK-LABEL: entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: do_safepoint
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+entry:
+  call void @do_safepoint()
+  ret void
+}