diff options
author | Jingyue Wu <jingyue@google.com> | 2015-05-08 18:07:24 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jingyue Wu <jingyue@google.com> | 2015-05-08 18:07:24 +0000 |
commit | 78b0d51cd004f6c6ffe1b3fc3651a3c17f7a1b09 (patch) | |
tree | 212d82b2c9d9e7e867d6151609d2f6e75561c4c8 /llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll | |
parent | 85b1c48b209ed21e6f7bddc2955706648aeb75ae (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-78b0d51cd004f6c6ffe1b3fc3651a3c17f7a1b09.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-78b0d51cd004f6c6ffe1b3fc3651a3c17f7a1b09.zip |
[NoTTI] reject negative scale in addressing mode
Summary:
I noticed this bug when deubging a WIP on LSR. I wonder whether and how we
should add a regression test for this.
Test Plan: no tests failed.
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9536
llvm-svn: 236887
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fdde1b6bf9d --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/negative-scale.ll @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -loop-reduce -S | FileCheck %s + +target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64" + +declare void @foo(i8) + +define void @not_addressing_mode(i8* %input, i64 %n) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @not_addressing_mode( +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: +; CHECK: loop: +; CHECK: %lsr.iv = phi i8* [ {{%[^,]+}}, %loop ], [ %input, %entry ] + %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop ] + %i.next = add i64 %i, 1 + %j = mul i64 %i, -2 + ; (%input - 2 * %j) is not foldable. Worth another indvar. + %p = getelementptr i8, i8* %input, i64 %j + %v = load i8, i8* %p +; CHECK: %v = load i8, i8* %lsr.iv + call void @foo(i8 %v) + %exitcond = icmp slt i64 %i.next, %n + br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop + +exit: + ret void +} |