[CodeGen] Don't attempt a tail-call with implicit sret.

Tailcalls are only OK with forwarded sret pointers. With sret demotion,
they're not, as we'd have a pointer into a soon-to-be-dead stack frame.

Differential Revison: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8510

llvm-svn: 233409

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tailcall-implicit-sret.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tailcall-implicit-sret.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5d6805998d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tailcall-implicit-sret.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple arm64-apple-darwin -aarch64-load-store-opt=false -asm-verbose=false | FileCheck %s
+; Disable the load/store optimizer to avoid having LDP/STPs and simplify checks.
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
+
+; Check that we don't try to tail-call with an sret-demoted return.
+
+declare i1024 @test_sret() #0
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: _test_call_sret:
+; CHECK: mov  x[[CALLERX8NUM:[0-9]+]], x8
+; CHECK: mov  x8, sp
+; CHECK-NEXT: bl _test_sret
+; CHECK-NEXT: ldr [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [sp]
+; CHECK: str [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [x[[CALLERX8NUM]]]
+; CHECK: ret
+define i1024 @test_call_sret() #0 {
+  %a = call i1024 @test_sret()
+  ret i1024 %a
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: _test_tailcall_sret:
+; CHECK: mov  x[[CALLERX8NUM:[0-9]+]], x8
+; CHECK: mov  x8, sp
+; CHECK-NEXT: bl _test_sret
+; CHECK-NEXT: ldr [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [sp]
+; CHECK: str [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [x[[CALLERX8NUM]]]
+; CHECK: ret
+define i1024 @test_tailcall_sret() #0 {
+  %a = tail call i1024 @test_sret()
+  ret i1024 %a
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: _test_indirect_tailcall_sret:
+; CHECK: mov  x[[CALLERX8NUM:[0-9]+]], x8
+; CHECK: mov  x8, sp
+; CHECK-NEXT: blr x0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ldr [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [sp]
+; CHECK: str [[CALLERSRET1:x[0-9]+]], [x[[CALLERX8NUM]]]
+; CHECK: ret
+define i1024 @test_indirect_tailcall_sret(i1024 ()* %f) #0 {
+  %a = tail call i1024 %f()
+  ret i1024 %a
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { nounwind }