diff options
| author | Max Kazantsev <max.kazantsev@azul.com> | 2018-02-15 07:47:17 +0000 | 
|---|---|---|
| committer | Max Kazantsev <max.kazantsev@azul.com> | 2018-02-15 07:47:17 +0000 | 
| commit | fd18002990074024d5700093d36ea6a61da97152 (patch) | |
| tree | 34f71c0147f2ed7b84cfb0ca5be7e7b579304145 /llvm/lib | |
| parent | 6e4ce23add3d57d06441933eb36dde3b69feea77 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-fd18002990074024d5700093d36ea6a61da97152.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-fd18002990074024d5700093d36ea6a61da97152.zip  | |
[NFC] Rename isKnownViaSimpleReasoning to isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning
llvm-svn: 325216
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | 30 | 
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp index b3ab693acac..279417cb1ab 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp @@ -8694,7 +8694,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,      return true;    // Otherwise see what can be done with some simple reasoning. -  return isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS); +  return isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS);  }  bool ScalarEvolution::isMonotonicPredicate(const SCEVAddRecExpr *LHS, @@ -8961,7 +8961,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,    // (interprocedural conditions notwithstanding).    if (!L) return true; -  if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS)) +  if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))      return true;    BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch(); @@ -9072,7 +9072,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,    assert(isAvailableAtLoopEntry(RHS, L) &&           "RHS is not available at Loop Entry"); -  if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS)) +  if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))      return true;    // If we cannot prove strict comparison (e.g. a > b), maybe we can prove @@ -9087,9 +9087,9 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,    if (ProvingStrictComparison) {      ProvedNonStrictComparison = -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(NonStrictPredicate, LHS, RHS); +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(NonStrictPredicate, LHS, RHS);      ProvedNonEquality = -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, LHS, RHS); +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, LHS, RHS);      if (ProvedNonStrictComparison && ProvedNonEquality)        return true;    } @@ -9644,7 +9644,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,    // Is the SGT predicate can be proved trivially or using the found context.    auto IsSGTViaContext = [&](const SCEV *S1, const SCEV *S2) { -    return isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2) || +    return isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2) ||             isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2, OrigFoundLHS,                                    FoundRHS, Depth + 1);    }; @@ -9749,7 +9749,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,  }  bool -ScalarEvolution::isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, +ScalarEvolution::isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,                                             const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {    return isKnownPredicateViaConstantRanges(Pred, LHS, RHS) ||           IsKnownPredicateViaMinOrMax(*this, Pred, LHS, RHS) || @@ -9771,26 +9771,26 @@ ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,      break;    case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:    case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE: -    if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) && -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS)) +    if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) && +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS))        return true;      break;    case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:    case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE: -    if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) && -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS)) +    if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) && +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS))        return true;      break;    case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:    case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE: -    if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) && -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS)) +    if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) && +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS))        return true;      break;    case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:    case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE: -    if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) && -        isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS)) +    if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) && +        isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS))        return true;      break;    }  | 

