[MC] Don't error on numberless .file directives on MachO

Summary:
Before r349976, MC ignored such directives when producing an object file
and asserted when re-producing textual assembly output. I turned this
assertion into a hard error in both cases in r349976, but this makes it
unnecessarily difficult to write a single assembly file that supports
both MachO and other object formats that support .file. A user reported
this as PR40578, and we decided to go back to ignoring the directive.

Fixes PR40578

Reviewers: mstorsjo

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57772

llvm-svn: 353218

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/AsmParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/AsmParser.cpp
index b2ff1e1dc47..a66a4eb29af 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/AsmParser.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/AsmParser.cpp
@@ -3370,10 +3370,11 @@ bool AsmParser::parseDirectiveFile(SMLoc DirectiveLoc) {
   }
 
   if (FileNumber == -1) {
-    if (!getContext().getAsmInfo()->hasSingleParameterDotFile())
-      return Error(DirectiveLoc,
-                   "target does not support '.file' without a number");
-    getStreamer().EmitFileDirective(Filename);
+    // Ignore the directive if there is no number and the target doesn't support
+    // numberless .file directives. This allows some portability of assembler
+    // between different object file formats.
+    if (getContext().getAsmInfo()->hasSingleParameterDotFile())
+      getStreamer().EmitFileDirective(Filename);
   } else {
     // In case there is a -g option as well as debug info from directive .file,
     // we turn off the -g option, directly use the existing debug info instead.