This patch fixes issue with lowering below mentioned pattern :-

_foo:
        smull	 r0, r1, r1, r0
	smull	 r2, r3, r3, r2
	adds	r0, r2, r0
	adc	r1, r3, r1
	bx	lr

to

_foo:
        smull	 r0, r1, r1, r0
	smlal	 r0, r1, r3, r2
	bx	lr

llvm-svn: 226904

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index f92f257cd7e..eab513e1d35 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -8058,29 +8058,35 @@ static SDValue AddCombineTo64bitMLAL(SDNode *AddcNode,
   else
     IsLeftOperandMUL = true;
   if (MULOp == SDValue())
-     return SDValue();
+    return SDValue();
 
   // Figure out the right opcode.
   unsigned Opc = MULOp->getOpcode();
   unsigned FinalOpc = (Opc == ISD::SMUL_LOHI) ? ARMISD::SMLAL : ARMISD::UMLAL;
 
   // Figure out the high and low input values to the MLAL node.
-  SDValue* HiMul = &MULOp;
   SDValue* HiAdd = nullptr;
   SDValue* LoMul = nullptr;
   SDValue* LowAdd = nullptr;
 
+  // Ensure that ADDE is from high result of ISD::SMUL_LOHI.
+  if ((AddeOp0 != MULOp.getValue(1)) && (AddeOp1 != MULOp.getValue(1)))
+    return SDValue();
+
   if (IsLeftOperandMUL)
     HiAdd = &AddeOp1;
   else
     HiAdd = &AddeOp0;
 
 
-  if (AddcOp0->getOpcode() == Opc) {
+  // Ensure that LoMul and LowAdd are taken from correct ISD::SMUL_LOHI node
+  // whose low result is fed to the ADDC we are checking.
+
+  if (AddcOp0 == MULOp.getValue(0)) {
     LoMul = &AddcOp0;
     LowAdd = &AddcOp1;
   }
-  if (AddcOp1->getOpcode() == Opc) {
+  if (AddcOp1 == MULOp.getValue(0)) {
     LoMul = &AddcOp1;
     LowAdd = &AddcOp0;
   }
@@ -8088,9 +8094,6 @@ static SDValue AddCombineTo64bitMLAL(SDNode *AddcNode,
   if (!LoMul)
     return SDValue();
 
-  if (LoMul->getNode() != HiMul->getNode())
-    return SDValue();
-
   // Create the merged node.
   SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;