diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-09-14 22:41:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-09-14 22:41:37 +0000 |
commit | 47ebd24e246929f3e64ee7132f12300c05d36fe8 (patch) | |
tree | b414821b1ae544867dc7a286cf6a1746e3beb45f /llvm/lib | |
parent | 66b0cebf7f736d888aae6c9aeb8c144049c24528 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-47ebd24e246929f3e64ee7132f12300c05d36fe8.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-47ebd24e246929f3e64ee7132f12300c05d36fe8.zip |
[x86] Teach the vector combiner that picks a canonical shuffle from to
support transforming the forms from the new vector shuffle lowering to
use 'movddup' when appropriate.
A bunch of the cases where we actually form 'movddup' don't actually
show up in the test results because something even later than DAG
legalization maps them back to 'unpcklpd'. If this shows back up as
a performance problem, I'll probably chase it down, but it is at least
an encoded size loss. =/
To make this work, also always do this canonicalizing step for floating
point vectors where the baseline shuffle instructions don't provide any
free copies of their inputs. This also causes us to canonicalize
unpck[hl]pd into mov{hl,lh}ps (resp.) which is a nice encoding space
win.
There is one test which is "regressed" by this: extractelement-load.
There, the test case where the optimization it is testing *fails*, the
exact instruction pattern which results is slightly different. This
should probably be fixed by having the appropriate extract formed
earlier in the DAG, but that would defeat the purpose of the test.... If
this test case is critically important for anyone, please let me know
and I'll try to work on it. The prior behavior was actually contrary to
the comment in the test case and seems likely to have been an accident.
llvm-svn: 217738
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp | 44 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp index f04a7810a13..f3774321a07 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp @@ -19301,26 +19301,52 @@ static bool combineX86ShuffleChain(SDValue Op, SDValue Root, ArrayRef<int> Mask, // Use the float domain if the operand type is a floating point type. bool FloatDomain = VT.isFloatingPoint(); - // If we don't have access to VEX encodings, the generic PSHUF instructions - // are preferable to some of the specialized forms despite requiring one more - // byte to encode because they can implicitly copy. + // For floating point shuffles, we don't have free copies in the shuffle + // instructions, so this always makes sense to canonicalize. // - // IF we *do* have VEX encodings, than we can use shorter, more specific + // For integer shuffles, if we don't have access to VEX encodings, the generic + // PSHUF instructions are preferable to some of the specialized forms despite + // requiring one more byte to encode because they can implicitly copy. + // + // IF we *do* have VEX encodings, then we can use shorter, more specific // shuffle instructions freely as they can copy due to the extra register // operand. - if (Subtarget->hasAVX()) { + if (FloatDomain || Subtarget->hasAVX()) { // We have both floating point and integer variants of shuffles that dup // either the low or high half of the vector. if (Mask.equals(0, 0) || Mask.equals(1, 1)) { bool Lo = Mask.equals(0, 0); - unsigned Shuffle = FloatDomain ? (Lo ? X86ISD::MOVLHPS : X86ISD::MOVHLPS) - : (Lo ? X86ISD::UNPCKL : X86ISD::UNPCKH); + unsigned Shuffle; + MVT ShuffleVT; + // If the input is a floating point, check if we have SSE3 which will let + // us use MOVDDUP. That instruction is no slower than UNPCKLPD but has the + // option to fold the input operand into even an unaligned memory load. + if (FloatDomain && Lo && Subtarget->hasSSE3()) { + Shuffle = X86ISD::MOVDDUP; + ShuffleVT = MVT::v2f64; + } else if (FloatDomain) { + // We have MOVLHPS and MOVHLPS throughout SSE and they encode smaller + // than the UNPCK variants. + Shuffle = Lo ? X86ISD::MOVLHPS : X86ISD::MOVHLPS; + ShuffleVT = MVT::v4f32; + } else if (Subtarget->hasSSE2()) { + // We model everything else using UNPCK instructions. While MOVLHPS and + // MOVHLPS are shorter encodings they cannot accept a memory operand + // which overly constrains subsequent lowering. + Shuffle = Lo ? X86ISD::UNPCKL : X86ISD::UNPCKH; + ShuffleVT = MVT::v2i64; + } else { + // No available instructions here. + return false; + } if (Depth == 1 && Root->getOpcode() == Shuffle) return false; // Nothing to do! - MVT ShuffleVT = FloatDomain ? MVT::v4f32 : MVT::v2i64; Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, ShuffleVT, Input); DCI.AddToWorklist(Op.getNode()); - Op = DAG.getNode(Shuffle, DL, ShuffleVT, Op, Op); + if (Shuffle == X86ISD::MOVDDUP) + Op = DAG.getNode(Shuffle, DL, ShuffleVT, Op); + else + Op = DAG.getNode(Shuffle, DL, ShuffleVT, Op, Op); DCI.AddToWorklist(Op.getNode()); DCI.CombineTo(Root.getNode(), DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, RootVT, Op), /*AddTo*/ true); |