diff options
author | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2015-11-09 21:16:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2015-11-09 21:16:49 +0000 |
commit | 32538d68117772c93c059a35523ea974397a8c56 (patch) | |
tree | 8866ae4fbcd4832e29a1544ef0674a6b15d156f3 /llvm/lib | |
parent | 65bc2b12233248f086461bea4d57bd2920c624c8 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-32538d68117772c93c059a35523ea974397a8c56.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-32538d68117772c93c059a35523ea974397a8c56.zip |
[x86] try harder to match bitwise 'or' into an LEA
The motivation for this patch starts with the epic fail example in PR18007:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18007
...unfortunately, this patch makes no difference for that case, but it solves some
simpler cases. We'll get there some day. :)
The current 'or' matching code was using computeKnownBits() via
isBaseWithConstantOffset() -> MaskedValueIsZero(), but that's an unnecessarily limited use.
We can do more by copying the logic in ValueTracking's haveNoCommonBitsSet(), so we can
treat the 'or' as if it was an 'add'.
There's a TODO comment here because we should lift the bit-checking logic into a helper
function, so it's not duplicated in DAGCombiner.
An example of the better LEA matching:
leal (%rdi,%rdi), %eax
andl $1, %esi
orl %esi, %eax
Becomes:
andl $1, %esi
leal (%rsi,%rdi,2), %eax
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13956
llvm-svn: 252515
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp | 32 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp index c5a1093af12..0cbeda91ccc 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp @@ -1338,19 +1338,29 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::matchAddressRecursively(SDValue N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM, return false; break; - case ISD::OR: - // Handle "X | C" as "X + C" iff X is known to have C bits clear. - if (CurDAG->isBaseWithConstantOffset(N)) { - X86ISelAddressMode Backup = AM; - ConstantSDNode *CN = cast<ConstantSDNode>(N.getOperand(1)); - - // Start with the LHS as an addr mode. - if (!matchAddressRecursively(N.getOperand(0), AM, Depth+1) && - !foldOffsetIntoAddress(CN->getSExtValue(), AM)) + case ISD::OR: { + // TODO: The bit-checking logic should be put into a helper function and + // used by DAGCombiner. + + // We want to look through a transform in InstCombine and DAGCombiner that + // turns 'add' into 'or', so we can treat this 'or' exactly like an 'add'. + APInt LHSZero, LHSOne; + APInt RHSZero, RHSOne; + CurDAG->computeKnownBits(N.getOperand(0), LHSZero, LHSOne); + CurDAG->computeKnownBits(N.getOperand(1), RHSZero, RHSOne); + + // If we know that there are no common bits set by the operands of this + // 'or', it is equivalent to an 'add'. For example: + // (or (and x, 1), (shl y, 3)) --> (add (and x, 1), (shl y, 3)) + // An 'lea' can then be used to match the shift (multiply) and add: + // and $1, %esi + // lea (%rsi, %rdi, 8), %rax + if ((LHSZero | RHSZero).isAllOnesValue()) + if (!matchAdd(N, AM, Depth)) return false; - AM = Backup; - } + break; + } case ISD::AND: { // Perform some heroic transforms on an and of a constant-count shift |