diff options
author | Owen Anderson <resistor@mac.com> | 2010-12-20 22:28:03 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Owen Anderson <resistor@mac.com> | 2010-12-20 22:28:03 +0000 |
commit | aa81496c76c751177fc53705b5521feb93387fe9 (patch) | |
tree | 75d54594a7ea85e37c28a240ff6abe726170d8bd /llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp | |
parent | 840bd6cce5ace4f42d58ec88f1aabd99138271f5 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-aa81496c76c751177fc53705b5521feb93387fe9.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-aa81496c76c751177fc53705b5521feb93387fe9.zip |
Revert r122114 (CallbackVH observing use-list changes) because it caused severe slowdowns on the Linux self-host configuration.
llvm-svn: 122279
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp | 38 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp b/llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp index 3c32c566e1f..76cfb9082a5 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp @@ -281,16 +281,6 @@ void Value::takeName(Value *V) { } -/// addUse - This method should only be used by the Use class. -/// -void Value::addUse(Use &U) { - U.addToList(&UseList); - - // Notify all ValueHandles (if present) that this value added a Use. - if (HasValueHandle) - ValueHandleBase::ValueAddedUse(U); -} - // uncheckedReplaceAllUsesWith - This is exactly the same as replaceAllUsesWith, // except that it doesn't have all of the asserts. The asserts fail because we // are half-way done resolving types, which causes some types to exist as two @@ -579,34 +569,6 @@ void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Value *V) { } } -void ValueHandleBase::ValueAddedUse(Use &U) { - assert(U->HasValueHandle && "Should only be called if ValueHandles present"); - - // Get the linked list base, which is guaranteed to exist since the - // HasValueHandle flag is set. - LLVMContextImpl *pImpl = U->getContext().pImpl; - ValueHandleBase *Entry = pImpl->ValueHandles[U.get()]; - - assert(Entry && "Value bit set but no entries exist"); - - // We use a local ValueHandleBase as an iterator so that - // ValueHandles can add and remove themselves from the list without - // breaking our iteration. This is not really an AssertingVH; we - // just have to give ValueHandleBase some kind. - for (ValueHandleBase Iterator(Assert, *Entry); Entry; Entry = Iterator.Next) { - Iterator.RemoveFromUseList(); - Iterator.AddToExistingUseListAfter(Entry); - assert(Entry->Next == &Iterator && "Loop invariant broken."); - - switch (Entry->getKind()) { - default: - break; - case Callback: - static_cast<CallbackVH*>(Entry)->addedUse(U); - break; - } - } -} void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(Value *Old, Value *New) { assert(Old->HasValueHandle &&"Should only be called if ValueHandles present"); |