summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com>2019-09-23 17:04:14 +0000
committerRoman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com>2019-09-23 17:04:14 +0000
commitb4a1d8a84ce0a825cb31f602e11913d06f69faf2 (patch)
treea1e07064f3ee0233058a8d53cb3831bf15054e5b /llvm/lib/Transforms
parent7414151929b60a4ba90570bd814610a20e44d76a (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-b4a1d8a84ce0a825cb31f602e11913d06f69faf2.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-b4a1d8a84ce0a825cb31f602e11913d06f69faf2.zip
[InstCombine] dropRedundantMaskingOfLeftShiftInput(): pat. a/b with mask (PR42563)
Summary: And this is **finally** the interesting part of that fold! If we have a pattern `(x & (~(-1 << maskNbits))) << shiftNbits`, we already know (have a fold) that will drop the `& (~(-1 << maskNbits))` mask iff `(maskNbits+shiftNbits) u>= bitwidth(x)`. But that is actually ignorant, there's more general fold here: In this pattern, `(maskNbits+shiftNbits)` actually correlates with the number of low bits that will remain in the final value. So even if `(maskNbits+shiftNbits) u< bitwidth(x)`, we can still fold, we will just need to apply a **constant** mask afterwards: ``` Name: a, normal+mask %onebit = shl i32 -1, C1 %mask = xor i32 %onebit, -1 %masked = and i32 %mask, %x %r = shl i32 %masked, C2 => %n0 = shl i32 %x, C2 %n1 = add i32 C1, C2 %n2 = zext i32 %n1 to i64 %n3 = shl i64 -1, %n2 %n4 = xor i64 %n3, -1 %n5 = trunc i64 %n4 to i32 %r = and i32 %n0, %n5 ``` https://rise4fun.com/Alive/F5R Naturally, old `%masked` will have to be one-use. Similar fold exists for patterns c,d,e, will post patch later. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563 Reviewers: spatel, nikic, xbolva00 Reviewed By: spatel Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67677 llvm-svn: 372629
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp33
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
index fee95927cd2..3f466495c5e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ dropRedundantMaskingOfLeftShiftInput(BinaryOperator *OuterShift,
m_Shr(m_Shl(m_AllOnes(), m_Value(MaskShAmt)), m_Deferred(MaskShAmt));
Value *X;
+ Constant *NewMask;
if (match(Masked, m_c_And(m_CombineOr(MaskA, MaskB), m_Value(X)))) {
// Can we simplify (MaskShAmt+ShiftShAmt) ?
auto *SumOfShAmts = dyn_cast_or_null<Constant>(
@@ -166,8 +167,27 @@ dropRedundantMaskingOfLeftShiftInput(BinaryOperator *OuterShift,
// bitwidth, we'll need to also produce a mask to keep SumOfShAmts low bits.
// So, does *any* channel need a mask?
if (!match(SumOfShAmts, m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::Predicate::ICMP_UGE,
- APInt(BitWidth, BitWidth))))
- return nullptr; // FIXME.
+ APInt(BitWidth, BitWidth)))) {
+ // But for a mask we need to get rid of old masking instruction.
+ if (!Masked->hasOneUse())
+ return nullptr; // Else we can't perform the fold.
+ // We should produce compute the mask in wider type, and truncate later!
+ // Get type twice as wide element-wise (same number of elements!).
+ Type *ExtendedScalarTy = Type::getIntNTy(Ty->getContext(), 2 * BitWidth);
+ Type *ExtendedTy =
+ Ty->isVectorTy()
+ ? VectorType::get(ExtendedScalarTy, Ty->getVectorNumElements())
+ : ExtendedScalarTy;
+ auto *ExtendedSumOfShAmts =
+ ConstantExpr::getZExt(SumOfShAmts, ExtendedTy);
+ // And compute the mask as usual: ~(-1 << (SumOfShAmts))
+ auto *ExtendedAllOnes = ConstantExpr::getAllOnesValue(ExtendedTy);
+ auto *ExtendedInvertedMask =
+ ConstantExpr::getShl(ExtendedAllOnes, ExtendedSumOfShAmts);
+ auto *ExtendedMask = ConstantExpr::getNot(ExtendedInvertedMask);
+ NewMask = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(ExtendedMask, Ty);
+ } else
+ NewMask = nullptr; // No mask needed.
// All good, we can do this fold.
} else if (match(Masked, m_c_And(m_CombineOr(MaskC, MaskD), m_Value(X))) ||
match(Masked, m_Shr(m_Shl(m_Value(X), m_Value(MaskShAmt)),
@@ -185,12 +205,19 @@ dropRedundantMaskingOfLeftShiftInput(BinaryOperator *OuterShift,
if (!match(ShAmtsDiff, m_NonNegative()))
return nullptr; // FIXME.
// All good, we can do this fold.
+ NewMask = nullptr; // No mask needed.
} else
return nullptr; // Don't know anything about this pattern.
// No 'NUW'/'NSW'!
// We no longer know that we won't shift-out non-0 bits.
- return BinaryOperator::Create(OuterShift->getOpcode(), X, ShiftShAmt);
+ auto *NewShift =
+ BinaryOperator::Create(OuterShift->getOpcode(), X, ShiftShAmt);
+ if (!NewMask)
+ return NewShift;
+
+ Builder.Insert(NewShift);
+ return BinaryOperator::Create(Instruction::And, NewShift, NewMask);
}
Instruction *InstCombiner::commonShiftTransforms(BinaryOperator &I) {
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud