diff options
author | Changpeng Fang <changpeng.fang@gmail.com> | 2018-05-23 18:34:48 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Changpeng Fang <changpeng.fang@gmail.com> | 2018-05-23 18:34:48 +0000 |
commit | 5f9154618e8a18c14e05dc5af4ce9d23c7045787 (patch) | |
tree | 078107a1dce508e55692208fee691df74ebb0b02 /llvm/lib/Transforms | |
parent | 664af9bc345e1c34f03f6bf95931d98e0f8d87bd (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-5f9154618e8a18c14e05dc5af4ce9d23c7045787.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-5f9154618e8a18c14e05dc5af4ce9d23c7045787.zip |
StructurizeCFG: Adjust the loop depth for a subregion to order the nodes correctly
Summary:
StructurizeCFG::orderNodes basically uses a reverse post-order (RPO) traversal of the region list to get the order.
The only problem with it is that sometimes backedges for outer loops will be visited before backedges for inner loops.
To solve this problem, a loop depth based approach has been used to make sure all blocks in this loop has been visited
before moving on to outer loop.
However, we found a problem for a SubRegion which is a loop itself:
--> BB1 --> BB2 --> BB3 -->
In this case, BB2 is a SubRegion (loop), and thus its loopdepth is different than that of BB1 and BB3. This fact will lead
BB2 to be placed in the wrong order.
In this work, we treat the SubRegion as a special case and use its exit block to determine the loop and its depth
to guard the sorting.
Reviewers:
arsenm, jlebar
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46912
llvm-svn: 333111
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/StructurizeCFG.cpp | 35 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/StructurizeCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/StructurizeCFG.cpp index 12976ee0c9e..9ff0f5bf89f 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/StructurizeCFG.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/StructurizeCFG.cpp @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ class StructurizeCFG : public RegionPass { void orderNodes(); + Loop *getAdjustedLoop(RegionNode *RN); + unsigned getAdjustedLoopDepth(RegionNode *RN); + void analyzeLoops(RegionNode *N); Value *invert(Value *Condition); @@ -301,6 +304,26 @@ bool StructurizeCFG::doInitialization(Region *R, RGPassManager &RGM) { return false; } +/// Use the exit block to determine the loop if RN is a SubRegion. +Loop *StructurizeCFG::getAdjustedLoop(RegionNode *RN) { + if (RN->isSubRegion()) { + Region *SubRegion = RN->getNodeAs<Region>(); + return LI->getLoopFor(SubRegion->getExit()); + } + + return LI->getLoopFor(RN->getEntry()); +} + +/// Use the exit block to determine the loop depth if RN is a SubRegion. +unsigned StructurizeCFG::getAdjustedLoopDepth(RegionNode *RN) { + if (RN->isSubRegion()) { + Region *SubR = RN->getNodeAs<Region>(); + return LI->getLoopDepth(SubR->getExit()); + } + + return LI->getLoopDepth(RN->getEntry()); +} + /// Build up the general order of nodes void StructurizeCFG::orderNodes() { ReversePostOrderTraversal<Region*> RPOT(ParentRegion); @@ -310,16 +333,15 @@ void StructurizeCFG::orderNodes() { // to what we want. The only problem with it is that sometimes backedges // for outer loops will be visited before backedges for inner loops. for (RegionNode *RN : RPOT) { - BasicBlock *BB = RN->getEntry(); - Loop *Loop = LI->getLoopFor(BB); + Loop *Loop = getAdjustedLoop(RN); ++LoopBlocks[Loop]; } unsigned CurrentLoopDepth = 0; Loop *CurrentLoop = nullptr; for (auto I = RPOT.begin(), E = RPOT.end(); I != E; ++I) { - BasicBlock *BB = (*I)->getEntry(); - unsigned LoopDepth = LI->getLoopDepth(BB); + RegionNode *RN = cast<RegionNode>(*I); + unsigned LoopDepth = getAdjustedLoopDepth(RN); if (is_contained(Order, *I)) continue; @@ -331,15 +353,14 @@ void StructurizeCFG::orderNodes() { auto LoopI = I; while (unsigned &BlockCount = LoopBlocks[CurrentLoop]) { LoopI++; - BasicBlock *LoopBB = (*LoopI)->getEntry(); - if (LI->getLoopFor(LoopBB) == CurrentLoop) { + if (getAdjustedLoop(cast<RegionNode>(*LoopI)) == CurrentLoop) { --BlockCount; Order.push_back(*LoopI); } } } - CurrentLoop = LI->getLoopFor(BB); + CurrentLoop = getAdjustedLoop(RN); if (CurrentLoop) LoopBlocks[CurrentLoop]--; |