diff options
author | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2018-01-08 15:05:34 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2018-01-08 15:05:34 +0000 |
commit | 31b4b76f99e1b8f10724e6b64f36b8a8c83db768 (patch) | |
tree | 6c3fb67a4142b95f1fe5c2d1ed8aad88a80aef97 /llvm/lib/Transforms | |
parent | 18b6b2f994f229b866efe93bfd812eff8ce77dfb (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-31b4b76f99e1b8f10724e6b64f36b8a8c83db768.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-31b4b76f99e1b8f10724e6b64f36b8a8c83db768.zip |
[InstCombine] fold min/max tree with common operand (PR35717)
There is precedence for factorization transforms in instcombine for FP ops with fast-math.
We also have similar logic in foldSPFofSPF().
It would take more work to add this to reassociate because that's specialized for binops,
and min/max are not binops (or even single instructions). Also, I don't have evidence that
larger min/max trees than this exist in real code, but if we find that's true, we might
want to reorganize where/how we do this optimization.
In the motivating example from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35717 , we have:
int test(int xc, int xm, int xy) {
int xk;
if (xc < xm)
xk = xc < xy ? xc : xy;
else
xk = xm < xy ? xm : xy;
return xk;
}
This patch solves that problem because we recognize more min/max patterns after rL321672
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Qjne
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3yg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41603
llvm-svn: 321998
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp | 60 |
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp index 96b8b4ffac6..7f5fb926440 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp @@ -1289,6 +1289,63 @@ static Instruction *foldSelectCmpXchg(SelectInst &SI) { return nullptr; } +/// Reduce a sequence of min/max with a common operand. +static Instruction *factorizeMinMaxTree(SelectPatternFlavor SPF, Value *LHS, + Value *RHS, + InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { + assert(SelectPatternResult::isMinOrMax(SPF) && "Expected a min/max"); + // TODO: Allow FP min/max with nnan/nsz. + if (!LHS->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) + return nullptr; + + // Match 3 of the same min/max ops. Example: umin(umin(), umin()). + Value *A, *B, *C, *D; + SelectPatternResult L = matchSelectPattern(LHS, A, B); + SelectPatternResult R = matchSelectPattern(RHS, C, D); + if (SPF != L.Flavor || L.Flavor != R.Flavor) + return nullptr; + + // Look for a common operand. The use checks are different than usual because + // a min/max pattern typically has 2 uses of each op: 1 by the cmp and 1 by + // the select. + Value *MinMaxOp = nullptr; + Value *ThirdOp = nullptr; + if (LHS->getNumUses() <= 2 && RHS->getNumUses() > 2) { + // If the LHS is only used in this chain and the RHS is used outside of it, + // reuse the RHS min/max because that will eliminate the LHS. + if (D == A || C == A) { + // min(min(a, b), min(c, a)) --> min(min(c, a), b) + // min(min(a, b), min(a, d)) --> min(min(a, d), b) + MinMaxOp = RHS; + ThirdOp = B; + } else if (D == B || C == B) { + // min(min(a, b), min(c, b)) --> min(min(c, b), a) + // min(min(a, b), min(b, d)) --> min(min(b, d), a) + MinMaxOp = RHS; + ThirdOp = A; + } + } else if (RHS->getNumUses() <= 2) { + // Reuse the LHS. This will eliminate the RHS. + if (D == A || D == B) { + // min(min(a, b), min(c, a)) --> min(min(a, b), c) + // min(min(a, b), min(c, b)) --> min(min(a, b), c) + MinMaxOp = LHS; + ThirdOp = C; + } else if (C == A || C == B) { + // min(min(a, b), min(b, d)) --> min(min(a, b), d) + // min(min(a, b), min(c, b)) --> min(min(a, b), d) + MinMaxOp = LHS; + ThirdOp = D; + } + } + if (!MinMaxOp || !ThirdOp) + return nullptr; + + CmpInst::Predicate P = getCmpPredicateForMinMax(SPF); + Value *CmpABC = Builder.CreateICmp(P, MinMaxOp, ThirdOp); + return SelectInst::Create(CmpABC, MinMaxOp, ThirdOp); +} + Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) { Value *CondVal = SI.getCondition(); Value *TrueVal = SI.getTrueValue(); @@ -1563,6 +1620,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) { Value *NewSel = Builder.CreateSelect(InvertedCmp, A, B); return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(NewSel); } + + if (Instruction *I = factorizeMinMaxTree(SPF, LHS, RHS, Builder)) + return I; } if (SPF) { |