InstCombine: Don't claim to be able to evaluate any shl in a zexted type.

The shift amount may be larger than the type leading to undefined behavior.
Limit the transform to constant shift amounts. While there update the bits to
clear in the result which may enable additional optimizations.

PR15959.

llvm-svn: 181604

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
index 2ee1278d23d..361acdde81f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
@@ -677,7 +677,6 @@ static bool CanEvaluateZExtd(Value *V, Type *Ty, unsigned &BitsToClear) {
   case Instruction::Add:
   case Instruction::Sub:
   case Instruction::Mul:
-  case Instruction::Shl:
     if (!CanEvaluateZExtd(I->getOperand(0), Ty, BitsToClear) ||
         !CanEvaluateZExtd(I->getOperand(1), Ty, Tmp))
       return false;
@@ -701,6 +700,17 @@ static bool CanEvaluateZExtd(Value *V, Type *Ty, unsigned &BitsToClear) {
     // Otherwise, we don't know how to analyze this BitsToClear case yet.
     return false;
 
+  case Instruction::Shl:
+    // We can promote shl(x, cst) if we can promote x.  Since shl overwrites the
+    // upper bits we can reduce BitsToClear by the shift amount.
+    if (ConstantInt *Amt = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(I->getOperand(1))) {
+      if (!CanEvaluateZExtd(I->getOperand(0), Ty, BitsToClear))
+        return false;
+      uint64_t ShiftAmt = Amt->getZExtValue();
+      BitsToClear = ShiftAmt < BitsToClear ? BitsToClear - ShiftAmt : 0;
+      return true;
+    }
+    return false;
   case Instruction::LShr:
     // We can promote lshr(x, cst) if we can promote x.  This requires the
     // ultimate 'and' to clear out the high zero bits we're clearing out though.