diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
commit | cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c (patch) | |
tree | 4b7b22b5e5b9ee152848a85ca3a911566532ecef /llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | |
parent | c980afc578f9c1af3b8916b4a503ea26ebaee018 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.zip |
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 43 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp index 77633a562a6..435c0054d0d 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp @@ -3344,12 +3344,11 @@ static bool hasOutsideLoopUser(const Loop *TheLoop, Instruction *Inst, // instructions must not have external users. if (!Reductions.count(Inst)) //Check that all of the users of the loop are inside the BB. - for (Value::use_iterator I = Inst->use_begin(), E = Inst->use_end(); - I != E; ++I) { - Instruction *U = cast<Instruction>(*I); + for (User *U : Inst->users()) { + Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U); // This user may be a reduction exit value. - if (!TheLoop->contains(U)) { - DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found an outside user for : " << *U << '\n'); + if (!TheLoop->contains(UI)) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found an outside user for : " << *UI << '\n'); return true; } } @@ -3545,9 +3544,8 @@ static Value *stripGetElementPtr(Value *Ptr, ScalarEvolution *SE, ///\brief Look for a cast use of the passed value. static Value *getUniqueCastUse(Value *Ptr, Loop *Lp, Type *Ty) { Value *UniqueCast = 0; - for (Value::use_iterator UI = Ptr->use_begin(), UE = Ptr->use_end(); UI != UE; - ++UI) { - CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(*UI); + for (User *U : Ptr->users()) { + CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(U); if (CI && CI->getType() == Ty) { if (!UniqueCast) UniqueCast = CI; @@ -4714,12 +4712,11 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::AddReductionVar(PHINode *Phi, // nodes once we get to them. SmallVector<Instruction *, 8> NonPHIs; SmallVector<Instruction *, 8> PHIs; - for (Value::use_iterator UI = Cur->use_begin(), E = Cur->use_end(); UI != E; - ++UI) { - Instruction *Usr = cast<Instruction>(*UI); + for (User *U : Cur->users()) { + Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U); // Check if we found the exit user. - BasicBlock *Parent = Usr->getParent(); + BasicBlock *Parent = UI->getParent(); if (!TheLoop->contains(Parent)) { // Exit if you find multiple outside users or if the header phi node is // being used. In this case the user uses the value of the previous @@ -4742,20 +4739,20 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::AddReductionVar(PHINode *Phi, // value must only be used once, except by phi nodes and min/max // reductions which are represented as a cmp followed by a select. ReductionInstDesc IgnoredVal(false, 0); - if (VisitedInsts.insert(Usr)) { - if (isa<PHINode>(Usr)) - PHIs.push_back(Usr); + if (VisitedInsts.insert(UI)) { + if (isa<PHINode>(UI)) + PHIs.push_back(UI); else - NonPHIs.push_back(Usr); - } else if (!isa<PHINode>(Usr) && - ((!isa<FCmpInst>(Usr) && - !isa<ICmpInst>(Usr) && - !isa<SelectInst>(Usr)) || - !isMinMaxSelectCmpPattern(Usr, IgnoredVal).IsReduction)) + NonPHIs.push_back(UI); + } else if (!isa<PHINode>(UI) && + ((!isa<FCmpInst>(UI) && + !isa<ICmpInst>(UI) && + !isa<SelectInst>(UI)) || + !isMinMaxSelectCmpPattern(UI, IgnoredVal).IsReduction)) return false; // Remember that we completed the cycle. - if (Usr == Phi) + if (UI == Phi) FoundStartPHI = true; } Worklist.append(PHIs.begin(), PHIs.end()); @@ -4801,7 +4798,7 @@ LoopVectorizationLegality::isMinMaxSelectCmpPattern(Instruction *I, // We must handle the select(cmp()) as a single instruction. Advance to the // select. if ((Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(I)) || (Cmp = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(I))) { - if (!Cmp->hasOneUse() || !(Select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(*I->use_begin()))) + if (!Cmp->hasOneUse() || !(Select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(*I->user_begin()))) return ReductionInstDesc(false, I); return ReductionInstDesc(Select, Prev.MinMaxKind); } |