diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
commit | cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c (patch) | |
tree | 4b7b22b5e5b9ee152848a85ca3a911566532ecef /llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp | |
parent | c980afc578f9c1af3b8916b4a503ea26ebaee018 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.zip |
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp | 69 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp index c90cc8fb479..71350e7b39c 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/BBVectorize.cpp @@ -1318,13 +1318,15 @@ namespace { // For each possible pairing for this variable, look at the uses of // the first value... - for (Value::use_iterator I = P.first->use_begin(), - E = P.first->use_end(); I != E; ++I) { - if (isa<LoadInst>(*I)) { + for (Value::user_iterator I = P.first->user_begin(), + E = P.first->user_end(); + I != E; ++I) { + User *UI = *I; + if (isa<LoadInst>(UI)) { // A pair cannot be connected to a load because the load only takes one // operand (the address) and it is a scalar even after vectorization. continue; - } else if ((SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*I)) && + } else if ((SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UI)) && P.first == SI->getPointerOperand()) { // Similarly, a pair cannot be connected to a store through its // pointer operand. @@ -1333,22 +1335,21 @@ namespace { // For each use of the first variable, look for uses of the second // variable... - for (Value::use_iterator J = P.second->use_begin(), - E2 = P.second->use_end(); J != E2; ++J) { - if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*J)) && + for (User *UJ : P.second->users()) { + if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UJ)) && P.second == SJ->getPointerOperand()) continue; // Look for <I, J>: - if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(*I, *J))) { - VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(*I, *J)); + if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(UI, UJ))) { + VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(UI, UJ)); ConnectedPairs[VP.first].push_back(VP.second); PairConnectionTypes.insert(VPPairWithType(VP, PairConnectionDirect)); } // Look for <J, I>: - if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(*J, *I))) { - VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(*J, *I)); + if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(UJ, UI))) { + VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(UJ, UI)); ConnectedPairs[VP.first].push_back(VP.second); PairConnectionTypes.insert(VPPairWithType(VP, PairConnectionSwap)); } @@ -1357,13 +1358,14 @@ namespace { if (Config.SplatBreaksChain) continue; // Look for cases where just the first value in the pair is used by // both members of another pair (splatting). - for (Value::use_iterator J = P.first->use_begin(); J != E; ++J) { - if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*J)) && + for (Value::user_iterator J = P.first->user_begin(); J != E; ++J) { + User *UJ = *J; + if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UJ)) && P.first == SJ->getPointerOperand()) continue; - if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(*I, *J))) { - VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(*I, *J)); + if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(UI, UJ))) { + VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(UI, UJ)); ConnectedPairs[VP.first].push_back(VP.second); PairConnectionTypes.insert(VPPairWithType(VP, PairConnectionSplat)); } @@ -1373,21 +1375,24 @@ namespace { if (Config.SplatBreaksChain) return; // Look for cases where just the second value in the pair is used by // both members of another pair (splatting). - for (Value::use_iterator I = P.second->use_begin(), - E = P.second->use_end(); I != E; ++I) { - if (isa<LoadInst>(*I)) + for (Value::user_iterator I = P.second->user_begin(), + E = P.second->user_end(); + I != E; ++I) { + User *UI = *I; + if (isa<LoadInst>(UI)) continue; - else if ((SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*I)) && + else if ((SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UI)) && P.second == SI->getPointerOperand()) continue; - for (Value::use_iterator J = P.second->use_begin(); J != E; ++J) { - if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*J)) && + for (Value::user_iterator J = P.second->user_begin(); J != E; ++J) { + User *UJ = *J; + if ((SJ = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UJ)) && P.second == SJ->getPointerOperand()) continue; - if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(*I, *J))) { - VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(*I, *J)); + if (CandidatePairsSet.count(ValuePair(UI, UJ))) { + VPPair VP(P, ValuePair(UI, UJ)); ConnectedPairs[VP.first].push_back(VP.second); PairConnectionTypes.insert(VPPairWithType(VP, PairConnectionSplat)); } @@ -1947,16 +1952,15 @@ namespace { Type *VTy = getVecTypeForPair(Ty1, Ty2); bool NeedsExtraction = false; - for (Value::use_iterator I = S->first->use_begin(), - IE = S->first->use_end(); I != IE; ++I) { - if (ShuffleVectorInst *SI = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(*I)) { + for (User *U : S->first->users()) { + if (ShuffleVectorInst *SI = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(U)) { // Shuffle can be folded if it has no other input if (isa<UndefValue>(SI->getOperand(1))) continue; } - if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(*I)) + if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(U)) continue; - if (PrunedDAGInstrs.count(*I)) + if (PrunedDAGInstrs.count(U)) continue; NeedsExtraction = true; break; @@ -1979,16 +1983,15 @@ namespace { } NeedsExtraction = false; - for (Value::use_iterator I = S->second->use_begin(), - IE = S->second->use_end(); I != IE; ++I) { - if (ShuffleVectorInst *SI = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(*I)) { + for (User *U : S->second->users()) { + if (ShuffleVectorInst *SI = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(U)) { // Shuffle can be folded if it has no other input if (isa<UndefValue>(SI->getOperand(1))) continue; } - if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(*I)) + if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(U)) continue; - if (PrunedDAGInstrs.count(*I)) + if (PrunedDAGInstrs.count(U)) continue; NeedsExtraction = true; break; |