[LoopVersioning] Expose loop versioning as a pass too

Summary:
LoopVersioning is a transform utility that transform passes can use to
run-time disambiguate may-aliasing accesses. I'd like to also expose as
pass to allow it to be unit-tested.

I am planning to add support for non-aliasing annotation in
LoopVersioning and I'd like to be able to write tests directly using
this pass.

(After that feature is done, the pass could also be used to look for
optimization opportunities that are hidden behind incomplete alias
information at compile time.)

The pass drives LoopVersioning in its default way which is to fully
disambiguate may-aliasing accesses no matter how many checks are
required.

Reviewers: hfinkel, ashutosh.nema, sbaranga

Subscribers: zzheng, mssimpso, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16612

llvm-svn: 259610

1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.cpp
index 9a2a06cf689..1aeffb79b19 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.cpp
@@ -145,3 +145,77 @@ void LoopVersioning::addPHINodes(
     PN->addIncoming(NonVersionedLoopInst, NonVersionedLoop->getExitingBlock());
   }
 }
+
+namespace {
+/// \brief Also expose this is a pass.  Currently this is only used for
+/// unit-testing.  It adds all memchecks necessary to remove all may-aliasing
+/// array accesses from the loop.
+class LoopVersioningPass : public FunctionPass {
+public:
+  LoopVersioningPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
+    initializeLoopVersioningPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
+  }
+
+  bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
+    auto *LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
+    auto *LAA = &getAnalysis<LoopAccessAnalysis>();
+    auto *DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
+    auto *SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE();
+
+    // Build up a worklist of inner-loops to version. This is necessary as the
+    // act of versioning a loop creates new loops and can invalidate iterators
+    // across the loops.
+    SmallVector<Loop *, 8> Worklist;
+
+    for (Loop *TopLevelLoop : *LI)
+      for (Loop *L : depth_first(TopLevelLoop))
+        // We only handle inner-most loops.
+        if (L->empty())
+          Worklist.push_back(L);
+
+    // Now walk the identified inner loops.
+    bool Changed = false;
+    for (Loop *L : Worklist) {
+      const LoopAccessInfo &LAI = LAA->getInfo(L, ValueToValueMap());
+      if (LAI.getNumRuntimePointerChecks() ||
+          !LAI.PSE.getUnionPredicate().isAlwaysTrue()) {
+        LoopVersioning LVer(LAI, L, LI, DT, SE);
+        LVer.versionLoop();
+        Changed = true;
+      }
+    }
+
+    return Changed;
+  }
+
+  void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
+    AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
+    AU.addPreserved<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
+    AU.addRequired<LoopAccessAnalysis>();
+    AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
+    AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
+    AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
+  }
+
+  static char ID;
+};
+}
+
+#define LVER_OPTION "loop-versioning"
+#define DEBUG_TYPE LVER_OPTION
+
+char LoopVersioningPass::ID;
+static const char LVer_name[] = "Loop Versioning";
+
+INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopVersioningPass, LVER_OPTION, LVer_name, false, false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopAccessAnalysis)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopVersioningPass, LVER_OPTION, LVer_name, false, false)
+
+namespace llvm {
+FunctionPass *createLoopVersioningPass() {
+  return new LoopVersioningPass();
+}
+}