diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
commit | cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c (patch) | |
tree | 4b7b22b5e5b9ee152848a85ca3a911566532ecef /llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp | |
parent | c980afc578f9c1af3b8916b4a503ea26ebaee018 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.zip |
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp | 25 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp index e9e0bc3ca35..15f00358194 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ llvm::RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Value *V, /// true when there are no uses or multiple uses that all refer to the same /// value. static bool areAllUsesEqual(Instruction *I) { - Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(); - Value::use_iterator UE = I->use_end(); + Value::user_iterator UI = I->user_begin(); + Value::user_iterator UE = I->user_end(); if (UI == UE) return true; @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ bool llvm::RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) { SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> Visited; for (Instruction *I = PN; areAllUsesEqual(I) && !I->mayHaveSideEffects(); - I = cast<Instruction>(*I->use_begin())) { + I = cast<Instruction>(*I->user_begin())) { if (I->use_empty()) return RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(I, TLI); @@ -752,10 +752,9 @@ bool llvm::TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB) { if (!Succ->getSinglePredecessor()) { BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB->begin(); while (isa<PHINode>(*BBI)) { - for (Value::use_iterator UI = BBI->use_begin(), E = BBI->use_end(); - UI != E; ++UI) { - if (PHINode* PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(*UI)) { - if (PN->getIncomingBlock(UI) != BB) + for (Use &U : BBI->uses()) { + if (PHINode* PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U.getUser())) { + if (PN->getIncomingBlock(U) != BB) return false; } else { return false; @@ -1056,11 +1055,10 @@ bool llvm::LowerDbgDeclare(Function &F) { // We only remove the dbg.declare intrinsic if all uses are // converted to dbg.value intrinsics. bool RemoveDDI = true; - for (Value::use_iterator UI = AI->use_begin(), E = AI->use_end(); - UI != E; ++UI) - if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*UI)) + for (User *U : AI->users()) + if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(U)) ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DDI, SI, DIB); - else if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(*UI)) + else if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(U)) ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DDI, LI, DIB); else RemoveDDI = false; @@ -1075,9 +1073,8 @@ bool llvm::LowerDbgDeclare(Function &F) { /// alloca 'V', if any. DbgDeclareInst *llvm::FindAllocaDbgDeclare(Value *V) { if (MDNode *DebugNode = MDNode::getIfExists(V->getContext(), V)) - for (Value::use_iterator UI = DebugNode->use_begin(), - E = DebugNode->use_end(); UI != E; ++UI) - if (DbgDeclareInst *DDI = dyn_cast<DbgDeclareInst>(*UI)) + for (User *U : DebugNode->users()) + if (DbgDeclareInst *DDI = dyn_cast<DbgDeclareInst>(U)) return DDI; return 0; |