diff options
author | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2016-04-15 15:57:41 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2016-04-15 15:57:41 +0000 |
commit | 75819aedf6d774a424e35793b266442708e57050 (patch) | |
tree | e4eabf3bd19e9dee6ed3aefc8f4e2cb16d6bb285 /llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp | |
parent | e76bda544bbf52d9ff3b55e6018b494a1e6bbc00 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-75819aedf6d774a424e35793b266442708e57050.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-75819aedf6d774a424e35793b266442708e57050.zip |
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp | 49 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp index cf39ae955ad..41d340b3080 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp @@ -172,52 +172,17 @@ void llvm::CloneFunctionInto(Function *NewFunc, const Function *OldFunc, TypeMapper, Materializer); } -// Find the MDNode which corresponds to the subprogram data that described F. -static DISubprogram *FindSubprogram(const Function *F, - DebugInfoFinder &Finder) { - for (DISubprogram *Subprogram : Finder.subprograms()) { - if (Subprogram->describes(F)) - return Subprogram; - } - return nullptr; -} - -// Add an operand to an existing MDNode. The new operand will be added at the -// back of the operand list. -static void AddOperand(DICompileUnit *CU, DISubprogramArray SPs, - Metadata *NewSP) { - SmallVector<Metadata *, 16> NewSPs; - NewSPs.reserve(SPs.size() + 1); - for (auto *SP : SPs) - NewSPs.push_back(SP); - NewSPs.push_back(NewSP); - CU->replaceSubprograms(MDTuple::get(CU->getContext(), NewSPs)); -} - // Clone the module-level debug info associated with OldFunc. The cloned data // will point to NewFunc instead. static void CloneDebugInfoMetadata(Function *NewFunc, const Function *OldFunc, ValueToValueMapTy &VMap) { - DebugInfoFinder Finder; - Finder.processModule(*OldFunc->getParent()); - - const DISubprogram *OldSubprogramMDNode = FindSubprogram(OldFunc, Finder); - if (!OldSubprogramMDNode) return; - - auto *NewSubprogram = - cast<DISubprogram>(MapMetadata(OldSubprogramMDNode, VMap)); - NewFunc->setSubprogram(NewSubprogram); - - for (auto *CU : Finder.compile_units()) { - auto Subprograms = CU->getSubprograms(); - // If the compile unit's function list contains the old function, it should - // also contain the new one. - for (auto *SP : Subprograms) { - if (SP == OldSubprogramMDNode) { - AddOperand(CU, Subprograms, NewSubprogram); - break; - } - } + if (const DISubprogram *OldSP = OldFunc->getSubprogram()) { + auto *NewSP = cast<DISubprogram>(MapMetadata(OldSP, VMap)); + // FIXME: There ought to be a better way to do this: ValueMapper + // will clone the distinct DICompileUnit. Use the original one + // instead. + NewSP->replaceUnit(OldSP->getUnit()); + NewFunc->setSubprogram(NewSP); } } |