diff options
author | Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com> | 2017-10-11 17:12:59 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com> | 2017-10-11 17:12:59 +0000 |
commit | 9590658fb88d40b88ad5bb34c66c946513579384 (patch) | |
tree | 7153e7514adc5b98d16cc7a026988c9644b7fa47 /llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp | |
parent | 87867988f9a57bae14a1d14865cca926205685ba (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-9590658fb88d40b88ad5bb34c66c946513579384.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-9590658fb88d40b88ad5bb34c66c946513579384.zip |
[NFC] Convert OptimizationRemarkEmitter old emit() calls to new closure
parameterized emit() calls
Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285
llvm-svn: 315476
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp | 18 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp index 62fb552cb08..23768675555 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp @@ -255,8 +255,10 @@ static bool markTails(Function &F, bool &AllCallsAreTailCalls, } if (SafeToTail) { using namespace ore; - ORE->emit(OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall-readnone", CI) - << "marked as tail call candidate (readnone)"); + ORE->emit([&]() { + return OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall-readnone", CI) + << "marked as tail call candidate (readnone)"; + }); CI->setTailCall(); Modified = true; continue; @@ -301,8 +303,10 @@ static bool markTails(Function &F, bool &AllCallsAreTailCalls, if (Visited[CI->getParent()] != ESCAPED) { // If the escape point was part way through the block, calls after the // escape point wouldn't have been put into DeferredTails. - ORE->emit(OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall", CI) - << "marked as tail call candidate"); + ORE->emit([&]() { + return OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall", CI) + << "marked as tail call candidate"; + }); CI->setTailCall(); Modified = true; } else { @@ -554,8 +558,10 @@ static bool eliminateRecursiveTailCall(CallInst *CI, ReturnInst *Ret, Function *F = BB->getParent(); using namespace ore; - ORE->emit(OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall-recursion", CI) - << "transforming tail recursion into loop"); + ORE->emit([&]() { + return OptimizationRemark(DEBUG_TYPE, "tailcall-recursion", CI) + << "transforming tail recursion into loop"; + }); // OK! We can transform this tail call. If this is the first one found, // create the new entry block, allowing us to branch back to the old entry. |