[SimpleLoopUnswitch] Don't consider unswitching `switch` insructions with one unique successor

Only instructions with two or more unique successors should be considered for unswitching.

Patch Author: Daniil Suchkov.

Reviewers: reames, asbirlea, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64404

llvm-svn: 365611

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
index 82e98ec1877..97153292238 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
@@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ unswitchBestCondition(Loop &L, DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo &LI,
       // We can only consider fully loop-invariant switch conditions as we need
       // to completely eliminate the switch after unswitching.
       if (!isa<Constant>(SI->getCondition()) &&
-          L.isLoopInvariant(SI->getCondition()))
+          L.isLoopInvariant(SI->getCondition()) && !BB->getUniqueSuccessor())
         UnswitchCandidates.push_back({SI, {SI->getCondition()}});
       continue;
     }