[PM] Replace the Pass argument to SplitEdge with specific analyses used

and updated.

This may appear to remove handling for things like alias analysis when
splitting critical edges here, but in fact no callers of SplitEdge
relied on this. Similarly, all of them wanted to preserve LCSSA if there
was any update of the loop info. That makes the interface much simpler.

With this, all of BasicBlockUtils.h is free of Pass arguments and
prepared for the new pass manager. This is tho majority of utilities
that relied on pass arguments.

llvm-svn: 226459

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
index 276af27f2fb..6bf8affcb2f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ void LoopUnswitch::UnswitchTrivialCondition(Loop *L, Value *Cond,
   // First step, split the preheader, so that we know that there is a safe place
   // to insert the conditional branch.  We will change loopPreheader to have a
   // conditional branch on Cond.
-  BasicBlock *NewPH = SplitEdge(loopPreheader, loopHeader, this);
+  BasicBlock *NewPH = SplitEdge(loopPreheader, loopHeader, DT, LI);
 
   // Now that we have a place to insert the conditional branch, create a place
   // to branch to: this is the exit block out of the loop that we should
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ void LoopUnswitch::UnswitchNontrivialCondition(Value *LIC, Constant *Val,
 
   // First step, split the preheader and exit blocks, and add these blocks to
   // the LoopBlocks list.
-  BasicBlock *NewPreheader = SplitEdge(loopPreheader, loopHeader, this);
+  BasicBlock *NewPreheader = SplitEdge(loopPreheader, loopHeader, DT, LI);
   LoopBlocks.push_back(NewPreheader);
 
   // We want the loop to come after the preheader, but before the exit blocks.
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ void LoopUnswitch::RewriteLoopBodyWithConditionConstant(Loop *L, Value *LIC,
     // and hooked up so as to preserve the loop structure, because
     // trying to update it is complicated.  So instead we preserve the
     // loop structure and put the block on a dead code path.
-    SplitEdge(Switch, SISucc, this);
+    SplitEdge(Switch, SISucc, DT, LI);
     // Compute the successors instead of relying on the return value
     // of SplitEdge, since it may have split the switch successor
     // after PHI nodes.