diff options
author | Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov> | 2015-01-10 00:30:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov> | 2015-01-10 00:30:55 +0000 |
commit | 38dd590861c32563c3bb38bc8ca53055fc89d691 (patch) | |
tree | 96054acf3ba7dfc69f16122ffe9b249a389ac53f /llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp | |
parent | 0f1b4997cef22f3a8a0798a4a253d0db38d8735d (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-38dd590861c32563c3bb38bc8ca53055fc89d691.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-38dd590861c32563c3bb38bc8ca53055fc89d691.zip |
[LoopUnroll] Fix the partial unrolling threshold for small loop sizes
When we compute the size of a loop, we include the branch on the backedge and
the comparison feeding the conditional branch. Under normal circumstances,
these don't get replicated with the rest of the loop body when we unroll. This
led to the somewhat surprising behavior that really small loops would not get
unrolled enough -- they could be unrolled more and the resulting loop would be
below the threshold, because we were assuming they'd take
(LoopSize * UnrollingFactor) instructions after unrolling, instead of
(((LoopSize-2) * UnrollingFactor)+2) instructions. This fixes that computation.
llvm-svn: 225565
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp | 17 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp index 4467112a181..fef52107f62 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp @@ -222,8 +222,11 @@ static unsigned ApproximateLoopSize(const Loop *L, unsigned &NumCalls, // Don't allow an estimate of size zero. This would allows unrolling of loops // with huge iteration counts, which is a compile time problem even if it's - // not a problem for code quality. - if (LoopSize == 0) LoopSize = 1; + // not a problem for code quality. Also, the code using this size may assume + // that each loop has at least three instructions (likely a conditional + // branch, a comparison feeding that branch, and some kind of loop increment + // feeding that comparison instruction). + LoopSize = std::max(LoopSize, 3u); return LoopSize; } @@ -407,7 +410,11 @@ bool LoopUnroll::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { unsigned LoopSize = ApproximateLoopSize(L, NumInlineCandidates, notDuplicatable, TTI, &AC); DEBUG(dbgs() << " Loop Size = " << LoopSize << "\n"); - uint64_t UnrolledSize = (uint64_t)LoopSize * Count; + + // When computing the unrolled size, note that the conditional branch on the + // backedge and the comparison feeding it are not replicated like the rest of + // the loop body (which is why 2 is subtracted). + uint64_t UnrolledSize = (uint64_t)(LoopSize-2) * Count + 2; if (notDuplicatable) { DEBUG(dbgs() << " Not unrolling loop which contains non-duplicatable" << " instructions.\n"); @@ -452,7 +459,7 @@ bool LoopUnroll::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { } if (PartialThreshold != NoThreshold && UnrolledSize > PartialThreshold) { // Reduce unroll count to be modulo of TripCount for partial unrolling. - Count = PartialThreshold / LoopSize; + Count = (std::max(PartialThreshold, 3u)-2) / (LoopSize-2); while (Count != 0 && TripCount % Count != 0) Count--; } @@ -466,7 +473,7 @@ bool LoopUnroll::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { // the original count which satisfies the threshold limit. while (Count != 0 && UnrolledSize > PartialThreshold) { Count >>= 1; - UnrolledSize = LoopSize * Count; + UnrolledSize = (LoopSize-2) * Count + 2; } if (Count > UP.MaxCount) Count = UP.MaxCount; |