NFC: make AtomicOrdering an enum class

Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.

The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).

This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.

As a follow-up I'll add:
  bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.

Reviewers: jyknight, reames

Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775

llvm-svn: 265602

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp
index 1931e7d8bc1..ed3715a3c4f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp
@@ -1222,34 +1222,34 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public InstVisitor<MemorySanitizerVisitor> {
 
   AtomicOrdering addReleaseOrdering(AtomicOrdering a) {
     switch (a) {
-      case NotAtomic:
-        return NotAtomic;
-      case Unordered:
-      case Monotonic:
-      case Release:
-        return Release;
-      case Acquire:
-      case AcquireRelease:
-        return AcquireRelease;
-      case SequentiallyConsistent:
-        return SequentiallyConsistent;
+      case AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic:
+        return AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic;
+      case AtomicOrdering::Unordered:
+      case AtomicOrdering::Monotonic:
+      case AtomicOrdering::Release:
+        return AtomicOrdering::Release;
+      case AtomicOrdering::Acquire:
+      case AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease:
+        return AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease;
+      case AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent:
+        return AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent;
     }
     llvm_unreachable("Unknown ordering");
   }
 
   AtomicOrdering addAcquireOrdering(AtomicOrdering a) {
     switch (a) {
-      case NotAtomic:
-        return NotAtomic;
-      case Unordered:
-      case Monotonic:
-      case Acquire:
-        return Acquire;
-      case Release:
-      case AcquireRelease:
-        return AcquireRelease;
-      case SequentiallyConsistent:
-        return SequentiallyConsistent;
+      case AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic:
+        return AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic;
+      case AtomicOrdering::Unordered:
+      case AtomicOrdering::Monotonic:
+      case AtomicOrdering::Acquire:
+        return AtomicOrdering::Acquire;
+      case AtomicOrdering::Release:
+      case AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease:
+        return AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease;
+      case AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent:
+        return AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent;
     }
     llvm_unreachable("Unknown ordering");
   }