diff options
author | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2018-10-16 14:35:21 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2018-10-16 14:35:21 +0000 |
commit | 0c48c977b84c91d4c1812bed7b2dc6b5fc376281 (patch) | |
tree | 3b61dfe07f196c704b5f9974187ff487152c309b /llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp | |
parent | eaab2b77e1a6c5709966e9609ed15496a90f2bc0 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-0c48c977b84c91d4c1812bed7b2dc6b5fc376281.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-0c48c977b84c91d4c1812bed7b2dc6b5fc376281.zip |
[InstCombine] try harder to form select from logic ops
This is part of solving PR37549:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37549
The patterns shown here are a special case of something
that we already convert to select. Using ComputeNumSignBits()
catches that case (but not the more complicated motivating
patterns yet).
The backend has hooks/logic to convert back to logic ops
if that's better for the target.
llvm-svn: 344609
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp | 66 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp index a6280ec95a9..5ffbf83508c 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp @@ -1831,14 +1831,28 @@ static bool areInverseVectorBitmasks(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) { /// We have an expression of the form (A & C) | (B & D). If A is a scalar or /// vector composed of all-zeros or all-ones values and is the bitwise 'not' of /// B, it can be used as the condition operand of a select instruction. -static Value *getSelectCondition(Value *A, Value *B, - InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { - // If these are scalars or vectors of i1, A can be used directly. +Value *InstCombiner::getSelectCondition(Value *A, Value *B) { + // Step 1: We need 0 or all-1's bitmasks. Type *Ty = A->getType(); - if (match(A, m_Not(m_Specific(B))) && Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) - return A; + if (ComputeNumSignBits(A) != Ty->getScalarSizeInBits()) + return nullptr; + + // Step 2: If B is the 'not' value of A, we have our answer. + if (match(A, m_Not(m_Specific(B)))) { + // If these are scalars or vectors of i1, A can be used directly. + if (Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) + return A; + return Builder.CreateTrunc(A, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); + } + + // If both operands are constants, see if the constants are inverse bitmasks. + Constant *AConst, *BConst; + if (match(A, m_Constant(AConst)) && match(B, m_Constant(BConst))) + if (AConst == ConstantExpr::getNot(BConst)) + return Builder.CreateZExtOrTrunc(A, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); - // If A and B are sign-extended, look through the sexts to find the booleans. + // Look for more complex patterns. The 'not' op may be hidden behind various + // casts. Look through sexts and bitcasts to find the booleans. Value *Cond; Value *NotB; if (match(A, m_SExt(m_Value(Cond))) && @@ -1854,36 +1868,30 @@ static Value *getSelectCondition(Value *A, Value *B, if (!Ty->isVectorTy()) return nullptr; - // If both operands are constants, see if the constants are inverse bitmasks. - Constant *AC, *BC; - if (match(A, m_Constant(AC)) && match(B, m_Constant(BC)) && - areInverseVectorBitmasks(AC, BC)) { - return Builder.CreateZExtOrTrunc(AC, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); - } - // If both operands are xor'd with constants using the same sexted boolean // operand, see if the constants are inverse bitmasks. - if (match(A, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Value(Cond)), m_Constant(AC)))) && - match(B, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Specific(Cond)), m_Constant(BC)))) && + // TODO: Use ConstantExpr::getNot()? + if (match(A, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Value(Cond)), m_Constant(AConst)))) && + match(B, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Specific(Cond)), m_Constant(BConst)))) && Cond->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1) && - areInverseVectorBitmasks(AC, BC)) { - AC = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(AC, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); - return Builder.CreateXor(Cond, AC); + areInverseVectorBitmasks(AConst, BConst)) { + AConst = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(AConst, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); + return Builder.CreateXor(Cond, AConst); } return nullptr; } /// We have an expression of the form (A & C) | (B & D). Try to simplify this /// to "A' ? C : D", where A' is a boolean or vector of booleans. -static Value *matchSelectFromAndOr(Value *A, Value *C, Value *B, Value *D, - InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { +Value *InstCombiner::matchSelectFromAndOr(Value *A, Value *C, Value *B, + Value *D) { // The potential condition of the select may be bitcasted. In that case, look // through its bitcast and the corresponding bitcast of the 'not' condition. Type *OrigType = A->getType(); A = peekThroughBitcast(A, true); B = peekThroughBitcast(B, true); - if (Value *Cond = getSelectCondition(A, B, Builder)) { + if (Value *Cond = getSelectCondition(A, B)) { // ((bc Cond) & C) | ((bc ~Cond) & D) --> bc (select Cond, (bc C), (bc D)) // The bitcasts will either all exist or all not exist. The builder will // not create unnecessary casts if the types already match. @@ -2234,21 +2242,21 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitOr(BinaryOperator &I) { // 'or' that it is replacing. if (Op0->hasOneUse() || Op1->hasOneUse()) { // (Cond & C) | (~Cond & D) -> Cond ? C : D, and commuted variants. - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, B, D, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, B, D)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, D, B, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, D, B)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, B, D, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, B, D)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, D, B, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, D, B)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, A, C, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, A, C)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, C, A, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, C, A)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, A, C, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, A, C)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); - if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, C, A, Builder)) + if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, C, A)) return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); } } |