Change allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses to take type argument since some targets

support unaligned mem access only for certain types. (Should it be size
instead?)

ARM v7 supports unaligned access for i16 and i32, some v6 variants support it
as well.

llvm-svn: 79127

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
index 0174778a1d4..605ed83eed2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
@@ -367,9 +367,10 @@ SDValue XCoreTargetLowering::
 LowerLOAD(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG)
 {
   LoadSDNode *LD = cast<LoadSDNode>(Op);
-  assert(LD->getExtensionType() == ISD::NON_EXTLOAD && "Unexpected extension type");
+  assert(LD->getExtensionType() == ISD::NON_EXTLOAD &&
+         "Unexpected extension type");
   assert(LD->getMemoryVT() == MVT::i32 && "Unexpected load EVT");
-  if (allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses()) {
+  if (allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses(LD->getMemoryVT())) {
     return SDValue();
   }
   unsigned ABIAlignment = getTargetData()->
@@ -465,7 +466,7 @@ LowerSTORE(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG)
   StoreSDNode *ST = cast<StoreSDNode>(Op);
   assert(!ST->isTruncatingStore() && "Unexpected store type");
   assert(ST->getMemoryVT() == MVT::i32 && "Unexpected store EVT");
-  if (allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses()) {
+  if (allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses(ST->getMemoryVT())) {
     return SDValue();
   }
   unsigned ABIAlignment = getTargetData()->
@@ -1048,7 +1049,8 @@ SDValue XCoreTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine(SDNode *N,
   case ISD::STORE: {
     // Replace unaligned store of unaligned load with memmove.
     StoreSDNode *ST  = cast<StoreSDNode>(N);
-    if (!DCI.isBeforeLegalize() || allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses() ||
+    if (!DCI.isBeforeLegalize() ||
+        allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses(ST->getMemoryVT()) ||
         ST->isVolatile() || ST->isIndexed()) {
       break;
     }