[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate

subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches.

This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when
using speculative load hardening.

I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to
seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so
far.

The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the
old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will
cause.

This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This
always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable --
you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are
getting retpolines.

I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an
LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in
Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and
instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in
order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code
so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk
continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this
I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that
in this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150

llvm-svn: 340515

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
index e207c343fac..46e30d786f0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
@@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ void X86FrameLowering::emitStackProbeCall(MachineFunction &MF,
   bool IsLargeCodeModel = MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Large;
 
   // FIXME: Add retpoline support and remove this.
-  if (Is64Bit && IsLargeCodeModel && STI.useRetpoline())
+  if (Is64Bit && IsLargeCodeModel && STI.useRetpolineIndirectCalls())
     report_fatal_error("Emitting stack probe calls on 64-bit with the large "
                        "code model and retpoline not yet implemented.");
 
@@ -2437,7 +2437,7 @@ void X86FrameLowering::adjustForSegmentedStacks(
     // is laid out within 2^31 bytes of each function body, but this seems
     // to be sufficient for JIT.
     // FIXME: Add retpoline support and remove the error here..
-    if (STI.useRetpoline())
+    if (STI.useRetpolineIndirectCalls())
       report_fatal_error("Emitting morestack calls on 64-bit with the large "
                          "code model and retpoline not yet implemented.");
     BuildMI(allocMBB, DL, TII.get(X86::CALL64m))