[MC] Separate masm integer literal lexer support from inline asm

Summary:
This renames the IsParsingMSInlineAsm member variable of AsmLexer to
LexMasmIntegers and moves it up to MCAsmLexer. This is the only behavior
controlled by that variable. I added a public setter, so that it can be
set from outside or from the llvm-mc command line. We may need to
arrange things so that users can get this behavior from clang, but
that's future work.

I also put additional hex literal lexing functionality under this flag
to fix PR32973. It appears that this hex literal parsing wasn't intended
to be enabled in non-masm-style blocks.

Now, masm integers (0b1101 and 0ABCh) work in __asm blocks from clang,
but 0b label references work when using .intel_syntax in standalone .s
files.

However, 0b label references will *not* work from __asm blocks in clang.
They will work from GCC inline asm blocks, which it sounds like is
important for Crypto++ as mentioned in PR36144.

Essentially, we only lex masm literals for inline asm blobs that use
intel syntax. If the .intel_syntax directive is used inside a gnu-style
inline asm statement, masm literals will not be lexed, which is
compatible with gas and llvm-mc standalone .s assembly.

This fixes PR36144 and PR32973.

Reviewers: Gerolf, avt77

Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53535

llvm-svn: 345189

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
index e67daa5d857..4801078925c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
@@ -3283,7 +3283,6 @@ bool X86AsmParser::ParseDirective(AsmToken DirectiveID) {
   if (IDVal.startswith(".code"))
     return ParseDirectiveCode(IDVal, DirectiveID.getLoc());
   else if (IDVal.startswith(".att_syntax")) {
-    getParser().setParsingInlineAsm(false);
     if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) {
       if (Parser.getTok().getString() == "prefix")
         Parser.Lex();
@@ -3296,7 +3295,6 @@ bool X86AsmParser::ParseDirective(AsmToken DirectiveID) {
     return false;
   } else if (IDVal.startswith(".intel_syntax")) {
     getParser().setAssemblerDialect(1);
-    getParser().setParsingInlineAsm(true);
     if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) {
       if (Parser.getTok().getString() == "noprefix")
         Parser.Lex();