Create new accessors to get arguments for call/invoke instructions. It breaks

encapsulation to force the users of these classes to know about the internal
data structure of the Operands structure. It also can lead to errors, like in
the MSIL writer.

llvm-svn: 105539

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/MSIL/MSILWriter.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/MSIL/MSILWriter.cpp
index 3de173cc26c..4b0aaa7c49a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/MSIL/MSILWriter.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/MSIL/MSILWriter.cpp
@@ -845,10 +845,11 @@ void MSILWriter::printCallInstruction(const Instruction* Inst) {
     // Handle intrinsic function.
     printIntrinsicCall(cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst));
   } else {
+    const CallInst *CI = cast<CallInst>(Inst);
     // Load arguments to stack and call function.
-    for (int I = 1, E = Inst->getNumOperands(); I!=E; ++I)
-      printValueLoad(Inst->getOperand(I));
-    printFunctionCall(Inst->getOperand(0),Inst);
+    for (int I = 0, E = CI->getNumArgOperands(); I!=E; ++I)
+      printValueLoad(CI->getArgOperand(I));
+    printFunctionCall(CI->getCalledFunction(), Inst);
   }
 }
 
@@ -1002,8 +1003,8 @@ void MSILWriter::printInvokeInstruction(const InvokeInst* Inst) {
   std::string Label = "leave$normal_"+utostr(getUniqID());
   Out << ".try {\n";
   // Load arguments
-  for (int I = 3, E = Inst->getNumOperands(); I!=E; ++I)
-    printValueLoad(Inst->getOperand(I));
+  for (int I = 0, E = Inst->getNumArgOperands(); I!=E; ++I)
+    printValueLoad(Inst->getArgOperand(I));
   // Print call instruction
   printFunctionCall(Inst->getOperand(0),Inst);
   // Save function result and leave "try" block