diff options
author | Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> | 2010-09-30 16:18:28 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> | 2010-09-30 16:18:28 +0000 |
commit | 90086abf2c2ea03aada7012a9560adbffcd00e24 (patch) | |
tree | 6615858820cb45b1efa6763530a8f652835284bd /llvm/lib/Support | |
parent | 448718a863a4ba3434b6258e5043a8e4ca6954d3 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-90086abf2c2ea03aada7012a9560adbffcd00e24.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-90086abf2c2ea03aada7012a9560adbffcd00e24.zip |
Grow BumpPtrAllocator's slab size dynamically if we allocated many slabs. This
reduces the amount of malloc calls and may reduce memory overhead.
Some numbers:
ASTContext stats, clang -cc1 -disable-free -fsyntax-only Cocoa_h.m
without dynamic growth | with dynamic growth
Number of memory regions: 3158 | Number of memory regions: 432
Bytes used: 12333185 | Bytes used: 12333185
Bytes allocated: 12935168 | Bytes allocated: 12800000
Bytes wasted: 601983 (includes alignment, etc) | Bytes wasted: 466815 (includes alignment, etc)
ASTContext stats, clang -cc1 -disable-free -fsyntax-only on clang's ASTReader.cpp
without dynamic growth | with dynamic growth
Number of memory regions: 10987 | Number of memory regions: 551
Bytes used: 42910356 | Bytes used: 42910356
Bytes allocated: 45002752 | Bytes allocated: 44711936
Bytes wasted: 2092396 (includes alignment, etc) | Bytes wasted: 1801580 (includes alignment, etc)
llvm-svn: 115151
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Support')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Support/Allocator.cpp | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/Allocator.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/Allocator.cpp index 90df262336c..02b45d8af98 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Support/Allocator.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Support/Allocator.cpp @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ char *BumpPtrAllocator::AlignPtr(char *Ptr, size_t Alignment) { /// StartNewSlab - Allocate a new slab and move the bump pointers over into /// the new slab. Modifies CurPtr and End. void BumpPtrAllocator::StartNewSlab() { + // If we allocated a big number of slabs already it's likely that we're going + // to allocate more. Increase slab size to reduce mallocs and possibly memory + // overhead. The factors are chosen conservatively to avoid overallocation. + if (BytesAllocated >= SlabSize * 128) + SlabSize *= 2; + MemSlab *NewSlab = Allocator.Allocate(SlabSize); NewSlab->NextPtr = CurSlab; CurSlab = NewSlab; |