Apply summary-based dead stripping to regular LTO modules with summaries.

If a regular LTO module has a summary index, then instead of linking
it into the combined regular LTO module right away, add it to the
combined summary index and associate it with a special module that
represents the combined regular LTO module.

Any such modules are linked during LTO::run(), at which time we use
the results of summary-based dead stripping to control whether to
link prevailing symbols.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33922

llvm-svn: 305482

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/LTO/LTOModule.cpp b/llvm/lib/LTO/LTOModule.cpp
index 331c51af56b..3cc8b7d0e77 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/LTO/LTOModule.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/LTO/LTOModule.cpp
@@ -77,14 +77,12 @@ bool LTOModule::isBitcodeFile(StringRef Path) {
 }
 
 bool LTOModule::isThinLTO() {
-  // Right now the detection is only based on the summary presence. We may want
-  // to add a dedicated flag at some point.
-  Expected<bool> Result = hasGlobalValueSummary(MBRef);
+  Expected<BitcodeLTOInfo> Result = getBitcodeLTOInfo(MBRef);
   if (!Result) {
     logAllUnhandledErrors(Result.takeError(), errs(), "");
     return false;
   }
-  return *Result;
+  return Result->IsThinLTO;
 }
 
 bool LTOModule::isBitcodeForTarget(MemoryBuffer *Buffer,