diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-01-13 13:07:17 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-01-13 13:07:17 +0000 |
commit | 73523021d0a97c150a76a5cf4a91e99cd03b9efb (patch) | |
tree | d2719d151f36e8afd70aee405bd992cd52a2022c /llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp | |
parent | ca9af6cad9e8c57c6e04ecffb19bb56493ab7608 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-73523021d0a97c150a76a5cf4a91e99cd03b9efb.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-73523021d0a97c150a76a5cf4a91e99cd03b9efb.zip |
[PM] Split DominatorTree into a concrete analysis result object which
can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.
This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.
The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.
Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.
llvm-svn: 199104
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp | 76 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp index c831c19517f..8fa742f745a 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/IR/Dominators.cpp @@ -64,35 +64,6 @@ bool BasicBlockEdge::isSingleEdge() const { TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock>); TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock>); -char DominatorTree::ID = 0; -INITIALIZE_PASS(DominatorTree, "domtree", - "Dominator Tree Construction", true, true) - -bool DominatorTree::runOnFunction(Function &F) { - DT->recalculate(F); - return false; -} - -void DominatorTree::verifyAnalysis() const { - if (!VerifyDomInfo) return; - - Function &F = *getRoot()->getParent(); - - DominatorTree OtherDT; - OtherDT.getBase().recalculate(F); - if (compare(OtherDT)) { - errs() << "DominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n"; - print(errs()); - errs() << "\nActual:\n"; - OtherDT.print(errs()); - abort(); - } -} - -void DominatorTree::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const { - DT->print(OS); -} - // dominates - Return true if Def dominates a use in User. This performs // the special checks necessary if Def and User are in the same basic block. // Note that Def doesn't dominate a use in Def itself! @@ -210,8 +181,7 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, return true; } -bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, - const Use &U) const { +bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, const Use &U) const { // Assert that we have a single edge. We could handle them by simply // returning false, but since isSingleEdge is linear on the number of // edges, the callers can normally handle them more efficiently. @@ -234,8 +204,7 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, return dominates(BBE, UseBB); } -bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def, - const Use &U) const { +bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def, const Use &U) const { Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent(); @@ -300,3 +269,44 @@ bool DominatorTree::isReachableFromEntry(const Use &U) const { // Everything else uses their operands in their own block. return isReachableFromEntry(I->getParent()); } + +void DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() const { + if (!VerifyDomInfo) + return; + + Function &F = *getRoot()->getParent(); + + DominatorTree OtherDT; + OtherDT.recalculate(F); + if (compare(OtherDT)) { + errs() << "DominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n"; + print(errs()); + errs() << "\nActual:\n"; + OtherDT.print(errs()); + abort(); + } +} + +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// DominatorTreeWrapperPass Implementation +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// The implementation details of the wrapper pass that holds a DominatorTree. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +char DominatorTreeWrapperPass::ID = 0; +INITIALIZE_PASS(DominatorTreeWrapperPass, "domtree", + "Dominator Tree Construction", true, true) + +bool DominatorTreeWrapperPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) { + DT.recalculate(F); + return false; +} + +void DominatorTreeWrapperPass::verifyAnalysis() const { DT.verifyDomTree(); } + +void DominatorTreeWrapperPass::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const { + DT.print(OS); +} + |