diff options
author | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2015-06-16 16:25:43 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> | 2015-06-16 16:25:43 +0000 |
commit | f134048b1d53a3f8b82f000560149b7b5c1522e5 (patch) | |
tree | 5807cfdd53dffb834b82d5474aaeb6f140835097 /llvm/lib/CodeGen | |
parent | 4f79f96fd7351a0bb731fcb508f76e6ab4ae2134 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-f134048b1d53a3f8b82f000560149b7b5c1522e5.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-f134048b1d53a3f8b82f000560149b7b5c1522e5.zip |
propagate IR-level fast-math-flags to DAG nodes, disabled by default
This is an updated version of the patch that was checked in at:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046
but subsequently reverted because it exposed a bug in the DAG Combiner:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
This time, there's an enablement flag ("EnableFMFInDAG") around the code in
SelectionDAGBuilder where we copy the set of FP optimization flags from IR
instructions to DAG nodes. So, in theory, there should be no functional change
from this patch as-is, but it will allow testing with the added functionality
to proceed via "-enable-fmf-dag" passed to llc.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10403
llvm-svn: 239828
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp | 72 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp | 30 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | 5 |
4 files changed, 63 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp index ab72941310d..95828fe374b 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp @@ -1463,12 +1463,9 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::combine(SDNode *N) { if (isa<ConstantSDNode>(N0) || !isa<ConstantSDNode>(N1)) { SDValue Ops[] = {N1, N0}; SDNode *CSENode; - if (const BinaryWithFlagsSDNode *BinNode = - dyn_cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N)) { + if (const auto *BinNode = dyn_cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N)) { CSENode = DAG.getNodeIfExists(N->getOpcode(), N->getVTList(), Ops, - BinNode->Flags.hasNoUnsignedWrap(), - BinNode->Flags.hasNoSignedWrap(), - BinNode->Flags.hasExact()); + &BinNode->Flags); } else { CSENode = DAG.getNodeIfExists(N->getOpcode(), N->getVTList(), Ops); } diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp index 20cec6ebad1..98eb8bf487f 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp @@ -400,19 +400,24 @@ static void AddNodeIDOperands(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, ID.AddInteger(Op.getResNo()); } } +/// Add logical or fast math flag values to FoldingSetNodeID value. +static void AddNodeIDFlags(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, unsigned Opcode, + const SDNodeFlags *Flags) { + if (!Flags || !isBinOpWithFlags(Opcode)) + return; -static void AddBinaryNodeIDCustom(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, bool nuw, bool nsw, - bool exact) { - ID.AddBoolean(nuw); - ID.AddBoolean(nsw); - ID.AddBoolean(exact); + unsigned RawFlags = Flags->getRawFlags(); + // If no flags are set, do not alter the ID. We must match the ID of nodes + // that were created without explicitly specifying flags. This also saves time + // and allows a gradual increase in API usage of the optional optimization + // flags. + if (RawFlags != 0) + ID.AddInteger(RawFlags); } -/// AddBinaryNodeIDCustom - Add BinarySDNodes special infos -static void AddBinaryNodeIDCustom(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, unsigned Opcode, - bool nuw, bool nsw, bool exact) { - if (isBinOpWithFlags(Opcode)) - AddBinaryNodeIDCustom(ID, nuw, nsw, exact); +static void AddNodeIDFlags(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const SDNode *N) { + if (auto *Node = dyn_cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N)) + AddNodeIDFlags(ID, Node->getOpcode(), &Node->Flags); } static void AddNodeIDNode(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, unsigned short OpC, @@ -507,20 +512,6 @@ static void AddNodeIDCustom(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const SDNode *N) { ID.AddInteger(ST->getPointerInfo().getAddrSpace()); break; } - case ISD::SDIV: - case ISD::UDIV: - case ISD::SRA: - case ISD::SRL: - case ISD::MUL: - case ISD::ADD: - case ISD::SUB: - case ISD::SHL: { - const BinaryWithFlagsSDNode *BinNode = cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N); - AddBinaryNodeIDCustom( - ID, N->getOpcode(), BinNode->Flags.hasNoUnsignedWrap(), - BinNode->Flags.hasNoSignedWrap(), BinNode->Flags.hasExact()); - break; - } case ISD::ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP: case ISD::ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS: case ISD::ATOMIC_SWAP: @@ -564,6 +555,8 @@ static void AddNodeIDCustom(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const SDNode *N) { } } // end switch (N->getOpcode()) + AddNodeIDFlags(ID, N); + // Target specific memory nodes could also have address spaces to check. if (N->isTargetMemoryOpcode()) ID.AddInteger(cast<MemSDNode>(N)->getPointerInfo().getAddrSpace()); @@ -960,14 +953,16 @@ void SelectionDAG::allnodes_clear() { BinarySDNode *SelectionDAG::GetBinarySDNode(unsigned Opcode, SDLoc DL, SDVTList VTs, SDValue N1, - SDValue N2, bool nuw, bool nsw, - bool exact) { + SDValue N2, + const SDNodeFlags *Flags) { if (isBinOpWithFlags(Opcode)) { + // If no flags were passed in, use a default flags object. + SDNodeFlags F; + if (Flags == nullptr) + Flags = &F; + BinaryWithFlagsSDNode *FN = new (NodeAllocator) BinaryWithFlagsSDNode( - Opcode, DL.getIROrder(), DL.getDebugLoc(), VTs, N1, N2); - FN->Flags.setNoUnsignedWrap(nuw); - FN->Flags.setNoSignedWrap(nsw); - FN->Flags.setExact(exact); + Opcode, DL.getIROrder(), DL.getDebugLoc(), VTs, N1, N2, *Flags); return FN; } @@ -3269,7 +3264,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic(unsigned Opcode, SDLoc DL, EVT VT, } SDValue SelectionDAG::getNode(unsigned Opcode, SDLoc DL, EVT VT, SDValue N1, - SDValue N2, bool nuw, bool nsw, bool exact) { + SDValue N2, const SDNodeFlags *Flags) { ConstantSDNode *N1C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(N1.getNode()); ConstantSDNode *N2C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(N2.getNode()); switch (Opcode) { @@ -3756,22 +3751,20 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getNode(unsigned Opcode, SDLoc DL, EVT VT, SDValue N1, // Memoize this node if possible. BinarySDNode *N; SDVTList VTs = getVTList(VT); - const bool BinOpHasFlags = isBinOpWithFlags(Opcode); if (VT != MVT::Glue) { SDValue Ops[] = {N1, N2}; FoldingSetNodeID ID; AddNodeIDNode(ID, Opcode, VTs, Ops); - if (BinOpHasFlags) - AddBinaryNodeIDCustom(ID, Opcode, nuw, nsw, exact); + AddNodeIDFlags(ID, Opcode, Flags); void *IP = nullptr; if (SDNode *E = FindNodeOrInsertPos(ID, DL.getDebugLoc(), IP)) return SDValue(E, 0); - N = GetBinarySDNode(Opcode, DL, VTs, N1, N2, nuw, nsw, exact); + N = GetBinarySDNode(Opcode, DL, VTs, N1, N2, Flags); CSEMap.InsertNode(N, IP); } else { - N = GetBinarySDNode(Opcode, DL, VTs, N1, N2, nuw, nsw, exact); + N = GetBinarySDNode(Opcode, DL, VTs, N1, N2, Flags); } InsertNode(N); @@ -6075,13 +6068,12 @@ SelectionDAG::getTargetInsertSubreg(int SRIdx, SDLoc DL, EVT VT, /// getNodeIfExists - Get the specified node if it's already available, or /// else return NULL. SDNode *SelectionDAG::getNodeIfExists(unsigned Opcode, SDVTList VTList, - ArrayRef<SDValue> Ops, bool nuw, bool nsw, - bool exact) { + ArrayRef<SDValue> Ops, + const SDNodeFlags *Flags) { if (VTList.VTs[VTList.NumVTs - 1] != MVT::Glue) { FoldingSetNodeID ID; AddNodeIDNode(ID, Opcode, VTList, Ops); - if (isBinOpWithFlags(Opcode)) - AddBinaryNodeIDCustom(ID, nuw, nsw, exact); + AddNodeIDFlags(ID, Opcode, Flags); void *IP = nullptr; if (SDNode *E = FindNodeOrInsertPos(ID, DebugLoc(), IP)) return E; diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp index 4035820244a..d1f881412f2 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ LimitFPPrecision("limit-float-precision", cl::location(LimitFloatPrecision), cl::init(0)); +static cl::opt<bool> +EnableFMFInDAG("enable-fmf-dag", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden, + cl::desc("Enable fast-math-flags for DAG nodes")); + // Limit the width of DAG chains. This is important in general to prevent // prevent DAG-based analysis from blowing up. For example, alias analysis and // load clustering may not complete in reasonable time. It is difficult to @@ -2148,6 +2152,8 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitBinary(const User &I, unsigned OpCode) { bool nuw = false; bool nsw = false; bool exact = false; + FastMathFlags FMF; + if (const OverflowingBinaryOperator *OFBinOp = dyn_cast<const OverflowingBinaryOperator>(&I)) { nuw = OFBinOp->hasNoUnsignedWrap(); @@ -2156,9 +2162,22 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitBinary(const User &I, unsigned OpCode) { if (const PossiblyExactOperator *ExactOp = dyn_cast<const PossiblyExactOperator>(&I)) exact = ExactOp->isExact(); - + if (const FPMathOperator *FPOp = dyn_cast<const FPMathOperator>(&I)) + FMF = FPOp->getFastMathFlags(); + + SDNodeFlags Flags; + Flags.setExact(exact); + Flags.setNoSignedWrap(nsw); + Flags.setNoUnsignedWrap(nuw); + if (EnableFMFInDAG) { + Flags.setAllowReciprocal(FMF.allowReciprocal()); + Flags.setNoInfs(FMF.noInfs()); + Flags.setNoNaNs(FMF.noNaNs()); + Flags.setNoSignedZeros(FMF.noSignedZeros()); + Flags.setUnsafeAlgebra(FMF.unsafeAlgebra()); + } SDValue BinNodeValue = DAG.getNode(OpCode, getCurSDLoc(), Op1.getValueType(), - Op1, Op2, nuw, nsw, exact); + Op1, Op2, &Flags); setValue(&I, BinNodeValue); } @@ -2206,9 +2225,12 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitShift(const User &I, unsigned Opcode) { dyn_cast<const PossiblyExactOperator>(&I)) exact = ExactOp->isExact(); } - + SDNodeFlags Flags; + Flags.setExact(exact); + Flags.setNoSignedWrap(nsw); + Flags.setNoUnsignedWrap(nuw); SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(Opcode, getCurSDLoc(), Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Op2, - nuw, nsw, exact); + &Flags); setValue(&I, Res); } diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp index 9daf2a50ad8..c70c3a27040 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp @@ -2671,8 +2671,9 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildExactSDIV(SDValue Op1, SDValue Op2, SDLoc dl, // TODO: For UDIV use SRL instead of SRA. SDValue Amt = DAG.getConstant(ShAmt, dl, getShiftAmountTy(Op1.getValueType())); - Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Amt, false, false, - true); + SDNodeFlags Flags; + Flags.setExact(true); + Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Amt, &Flags); d = d.ashr(ShAmt); } |