summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/CodeGen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBjorn Pettersson <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com>2019-09-07 12:16:23 +0000
committerBjorn Pettersson <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com>2019-09-07 12:16:23 +0000
commitd065c811649f0d0df5429741a9a3dd643e88a9fe (patch)
tree3e99e0e9a83ebaf1d1eed71659a69ffaebedb96d /llvm/lib/CodeGen
parent5e331e4ce85ad37dca45739846c2a801f06ab573 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-d065c811649f0d0df5429741a9a3dd643e88a9fe.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-d065c811649f0d0df5429741a9a3dd643e88a9fe.zip
[CodeGen] Handle SMULFIXSAT with scale zero in TargetLowering::expandFixedPointMul
Summary: Normally TargetLowering::expandFixedPointMul would handle SMULFIXSAT with scale zero by using an SMULO to compute the product and determine if saturation is needed (if overflow happened). But if SMULO isn't custom/legal it falls through and uses the same technique, using MULHS/SMUL_LOHI, as used for non-zero scales. Problem was that when checking for overflow (handling saturation) when not using MULO we did not expect to find a zero scale. So we ended up in an assertion when doing APInt::getLowBitsSet(VTSize, Scale - 1) This patch fixes the problem by adding a new special case for how saturation is computed when scale is zero. Reviewers: RKSimon, bevinh, leonardchan, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, jsji, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67071 llvm-svn: 371309
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp31
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index b42e272c3c1..d974c8cf3c7 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -6800,26 +6800,37 @@ TargetLowering::expandFixedPointMul(SDNode *Node, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
}
// Signed overflow happened if the upper (VTSize - Scale + 1) bits (of the
- // widened multiplication) aren't all ones or all zeroes. We handled Scale==0
- // above so all the bits to examine is in Hi.
+ // widened multiplication) aren't all ones or all zeroes.
+
+ SDValue SatMin = DAG.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMinValue(VTSize), dl, VT);
+ SDValue SatMax = DAG.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(VTSize), dl, VT);
+
+ if (Scale == 0) {
+ SDValue Sign = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, VT, Lo,
+ DAG.getConstant(VTSize - 1, dl, ShiftTy));
+ SDValue Overflow = DAG.getSetCC(dl, BoolVT, Hi, Sign, ISD::SETNE);
+ // Saturated to SatMin if wide product is negative, and SatMax if wide
+ // product is positive ...
+ SDValue Zero = DAG.getConstant(0, dl, VT);
+ SDValue ResultIfOverflow = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Hi, Zero, SatMin, SatMax,
+ ISD::SETLT);
+ // ... but only if we overflowed.
+ return DAG.getSelect(dl, VT, Overflow, ResultIfOverflow, Result);
+ }
+
+ // We handled Scale==0 above so all the bits to examine is in Hi.
// Saturate to max if ((Hi >> (Scale - 1)) > 0),
// which is the same as if (Hi > (1 << (Scale - 1)) - 1)
- APInt MaxVal = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(VTSize);
SDValue LowMask = DAG.getConstant(APInt::getLowBitsSet(VTSize, Scale - 1),
dl, VT);
- Result = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Hi, LowMask,
- DAG.getConstant(MaxVal, dl, VT), Result,
- ISD::SETGT);
+ Result = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Hi, LowMask, SatMax, Result, ISD::SETGT);
// Saturate to min if (Hi >> (Scale - 1)) < -1),
// which is the same as if (HI < (-1 << (Scale - 1))
- APInt MinVal = APInt::getSignedMinValue(VTSize);
SDValue HighMask =
DAG.getConstant(APInt::getHighBitsSet(VTSize, VTSize - Scale + 1),
dl, VT);
- Result = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Hi, HighMask,
- DAG.getConstant(MinVal, dl, VT), Result,
- ISD::SETLT);
+ Result = DAG.getSelectCC(dl, Hi, HighMask, SatMin, Result, ISD::SETLT);
return Result;
}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud