diff options
author | Simon Dardis <simon.dardis@imgtec.com> | 2017-06-14 14:46:30 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Dardis <simon.dardis@imgtec.com> | 2017-06-14 14:46:30 +0000 |
commit | 9790e39f4526f76f251a432bcc0e9bec8397aea9 (patch) | |
tree | 3304969af4552ccada5e8694f7c4cc8c239af75c /llvm/lib/CodeGen | |
parent | d268e2a52dc416ff8fcaae6a3cfe92f87b325a02 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-9790e39f4526f76f251a432bcc0e9bec8397aea9.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-9790e39f4526f76f251a432bcc0e9bec8397aea9.zip |
[mips] Fix multiprecision arithmetic.
For multiprecision arithmetic on MIPS, rather than using ISD::ADDE / ISD::ADDC,
get SelectionDAG to break down the operation into ISD::ADDs and ISD::SETCCs.
For MIPS, only the DSP ASE has a carry flag, so in the general case it is not
useful to directly support ISD::{ADDE, ADDC, SUBE, SUBC} nodes.
Also improve the generation code in such cases for targets with
TargetLoweringBase::ZeroOrOneBooleanContent by directly using the result of the
comparison node rather than using it in selects. Similarly for ISD::SUBE /
ISD::SUBC.
Address optimization breakage by moving the generation of MIPS specific integer
multiply-accumulate nodes to before legalization.
This revolves PR32713 and PR33424.
Thanks to Simonas Kazlauskas and Pirama Arumuga Nainar for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33494
llvm-svn: 305389
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp | 21 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp index 0d5e07ded25..a3ba52a148e 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp @@ -1828,10 +1828,11 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(N->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD ? ISD::UADDO : ISD::USUBO, TLI.getTypeToExpandTo(*DAG.getContext(), NVT)); + TargetLoweringBase::BooleanContent BoolType = TLI.getBooleanContents(NVT); + if (hasOVF) { EVT OvfVT = getSetCCResultType(NVT); SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(NVT, OvfVT); - TargetLoweringBase::BooleanContent BoolType = TLI.getBooleanContents(NVT); int RevOpc; if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { RevOpc = ISD::SUB; @@ -1864,6 +1865,13 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, dl, NVT, makeArrayRef(HiOps, 2)); SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(dl, getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, LoOps[0], ISD::SETULT); + + if (BoolType == TargetLoweringBase::ZeroOrOneBooleanContent) { + SDValue Carry = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(Cmp1, dl, NVT); + Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, dl, NVT, Hi, Carry); + return; + } + SDValue Carry1 = DAG.getSelect(dl, NVT, Cmp1, DAG.getConstant(1, dl, NVT), DAG.getConstant(0, dl, NVT)); @@ -1878,9 +1886,14 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(dl, getSetCCResultType(LoOps[0].getValueType()), LoOps[0], LoOps[1], ISD::SETULT); - SDValue Borrow = DAG.getSelect(dl, NVT, Cmp, - DAG.getConstant(1, dl, NVT), - DAG.getConstant(0, dl, NVT)); + + SDValue Borrow; + if (BoolType == TargetLoweringBase::ZeroOrOneBooleanContent) + Borrow = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(Cmp, dl, NVT); + else + Borrow = DAG.getSelect(dl, NVT, Cmp, DAG.getConstant(1, dl, NVT), + DAG.getConstant(0, dl, NVT)); + Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, NVT, Hi, Borrow); } } |