diff options
author | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2014-02-27 17:56:08 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2014-02-27 17:56:08 +0000 |
commit | 7072073cc99b63a39cefaea71ae331642d95d96e (patch) | |
tree | 3464cf02a69b174924d5464b5c016dd3351e82cb /llvm/lib/CodeGen | |
parent | eace60b161c249f486e381f81e4fa6199952846a (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-7072073cc99b63a39cefaea71ae331642d95d96e.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-7072073cc99b63a39cefaea71ae331642d95d96e.zip |
Debug info: Remove ARMAsmPrinter::EmitDwarfRegOp(). AsmPrinter can now
scan the register file for sub- and super-registers.
No functionality change intended.
(Tests are updated because the comments in the assembler output are
different.)
llvm-svn: 202416
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp | 117 |
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp index 548ef97962d..d59713c142e 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include "llvm/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.h" #include "DwarfDebug.h" #include "DwarfException.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h" #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h" @@ -908,13 +909,9 @@ static void emitDwarfRegOpIndirect(const AsmPrinter &AP, /// Emit a dwarf register operation for describing /// - a small value occupying only part of a register or /// - a small register representing only part of a value. -static void emitDwarfRegOpPiece(const AsmPrinter &AP, - int Reg, unsigned Size, unsigned Offset) { - assert(Reg >= 0); +static void emitDwarfOpPiece(const AsmPrinter &AP, + unsigned Size, unsigned Offset) { assert(Size > 0); - - emitDwarfRegOp(AP, Reg); - // Emit Mask if (Offset > 0) { AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("DW_OP_bit_piece"); AP.EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_bit_piece); @@ -931,41 +928,93 @@ static void emitDwarfRegOpPiece(const AsmPrinter &AP, } } +/// Some targets do not provide a DWARF register number for every +/// register. This function attempts to emit a dwarf register by +/// emitting a piece of a super-register or by piecing together +/// multiple subregisters that alias the register. +static void EmitDwarfRegOpPiece(const AsmPrinter &AP, + const MachineLocation &MLoc) { + assert(!MLoc.isIndirect()); + const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = AP.TM.getRegisterInfo(); + int Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MLoc.getReg(), false); + + // Walk up the super-register chain until we find a valid number. + // For example, EAX on x86_64 is a 32-bit piece of RAX with offset 0. + for (MCSuperRegIterator SR(MLoc.getReg(), TRI); SR.isValid(); ++SR) { + Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(*SR, false); + if (Reg >= 0) { + unsigned Idx = TRI->getSubRegIndex(*SR, MLoc.getReg()); + unsigned Size = TRI->getSubRegIdxSize(Idx); + unsigned Offset = TRI->getSubRegIdxOffset(Idx); + AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("super-register"); + emitDwarfRegOp(AP, Reg); + emitDwarfOpPiece(AP, Size, Offset); + return; + } + } + + // Otherwise, attempt to find a covering set of sub-register numbers. + // For example, Q0 on ARM is a composition of D0+D1. + // + // Keep track of the current position so we can emit the more + // efficient DW_OP_piece. + unsigned CurPos = 0; + // The size of the register in bits, assuming 8 bits per byte. + unsigned RegSize = TRI->getMinimalPhysRegClass(MLoc.getReg())->getSize()*8; + // Keep track of the bits in the register we already emitted, so we + // can avoid emitting redundant aliasing subregs. + SmallBitVector Coverage(RegSize, false); + for (MCSubRegIterator SR(MLoc.getReg(), TRI); SR.isValid(); ++SR) { + unsigned Idx = TRI->getSubRegIndex(MLoc.getReg(), *SR); + unsigned Size = TRI->getSubRegIdxSize(Idx); + unsigned Offset = TRI->getSubRegIdxOffset(Idx); + Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(*SR, false); + + // Intersection between the bits we already emitted and the bits + // covered by this subregister. + SmallBitVector Intersection(RegSize, false); + Intersection.set(Offset, Offset+Size); + Intersection ^= Coverage; + + // If this sub-register has a DWARF number and we haven't covered + // its range, emit a DWARF piece for it. + if (Reg >= 0 && Intersection.any()) { + AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("sub-register"); + emitDwarfRegOp(AP, Reg); + emitDwarfOpPiece(AP, Size, Offset == CurPos ? 0 : Offset); + CurPos = Offset+Size; + + // Mark it as emitted. + Coverage.set(Offset, Offset+Size); + } + } + + if (CurPos == 0) { + // FIXME: We have no reasonable way of handling errors in here. + AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("nop (could not find a dwarf register number)"); + AP.EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_nop); + } +} + /// EmitDwarfRegOp - Emit dwarf register operation. void AsmPrinter::EmitDwarfRegOp(const MachineLocation &MLoc, bool Indirect) const { const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = TM.getRegisterInfo(); int Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MLoc.getReg(), false); - if (Reg < 0) { - // Walk up the super-register chain until we find a valid number. - for (MCSuperRegIterator SR(MLoc.getReg(), TRI); SR.isValid(); ++SR) { - Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(*SR, false); - if (Reg >= 0) { - unsigned Idx = TRI->getSubRegIndex(*SR, MLoc.getReg()); - unsigned Size = TRI->getSubRegIdxSize(Idx); - unsigned Offset = TRI->getSubRegIdxOffset(Idx); - emitDwarfRegOpPiece(*this, Reg, Size, Offset); - - if (MLoc.isIndirect()) - EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_deref); - - if (Indirect) - EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_deref); - - return; - } - - // FIXME: Handle cases like a super register being encoded as - // DW_OP_reg 32 DW_OP_piece 4 DW_OP_reg 33 - + // We assume that pointers are always in an addressable register. + if (Indirect || MLoc.isIndirect()) { + // FIXME: We have no reasonable way of handling errors in here. The + // caller might be in the middle of a dwarf expression. We should + // probably assert that Reg >= 0 once debug info generation is more mature. + OutStreamer.AddComment("nop (invalid dwarf register number for indirect loc)"); + EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_nop); + return; } - // FIXME: We have no reasonable way of handling errors in here. The - // caller might be in the middle of an dwarf expression. We should - // probably assert that Reg >= 0 once debug info generation is more mature. - OutStreamer.AddComment("nop (invalid dwarf register number)"); - EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_nop); - return; + + // Attempt to find a valid super- or sub-register. + if (!Indirect && !MLoc.isIndirect()) + return EmitDwarfRegOpPiece(*this, MLoc); } if (MLoc.isIndirect()) |