[Atomic] Remove IsStore/IsLoad in the interface, and pass the instruction instead. NFC.

Now both emitLeadingFence and emitTrailingFence take the instruction
itself, instead of taking IsLoad/IsStore pairs.
Instruction::mayReadFromMemory and Instrucion::mayWriteToMemory are used
for determining those two booleans.

The instruction argument is also useful for later D32763, in
emitTrailingFence. For emitLeadingFence, it seems to have cleaner
interface with the proposed change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32762

llvm-svn: 302539

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp
index 9c19a4fd3c3..17e6be05eb4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp
@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@ namespace {
     bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
 
   private:
-    bool bracketInstWithFences(Instruction *I, AtomicOrdering Order,
-                               bool IsStore, bool IsLoad);
+    bool bracketInstWithFences(Instruction *I, AtomicOrdering Order);
     IntegerType *getCorrespondingIntegerType(Type *T, const DataLayout &DL);
     LoadInst *convertAtomicLoadToIntegerType(LoadInst *LI);
     bool tryExpandAtomicLoad(LoadInst *LI);
@@ -224,22 +223,16 @@ bool AtomicExpand::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
 
     if (TLI->shouldInsertFencesForAtomic(I)) {
       auto FenceOrdering = AtomicOrdering::Monotonic;
-      bool IsStore, IsLoad;
       if (LI && isAcquireOrStronger(LI->getOrdering())) {
         FenceOrdering = LI->getOrdering();
         LI->setOrdering(AtomicOrdering::Monotonic);
-        IsStore = false;
-        IsLoad = true;
       } else if (SI && isReleaseOrStronger(SI->getOrdering())) {
         FenceOrdering = SI->getOrdering();
         SI->setOrdering(AtomicOrdering::Monotonic);
-        IsStore = true;
-        IsLoad = false;
       } else if (RMWI && (isReleaseOrStronger(RMWI->getOrdering()) ||
                           isAcquireOrStronger(RMWI->getOrdering()))) {
         FenceOrdering = RMWI->getOrdering();
         RMWI->setOrdering(AtomicOrdering::Monotonic);
-        IsStore = IsLoad = true;
       } else if (CASI && !TLI->shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR(CASI) &&
                  (isReleaseOrStronger(CASI->getSuccessOrdering()) ||
                   isAcquireOrStronger(CASI->getSuccessOrdering()))) {
@@ -250,11 +243,10 @@ bool AtomicExpand::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
         FenceOrdering = CASI->getSuccessOrdering();
         CASI->setSuccessOrdering(AtomicOrdering::Monotonic);
         CASI->setFailureOrdering(AtomicOrdering::Monotonic);
-        IsStore = IsLoad = true;
       }
 
       if (FenceOrdering != AtomicOrdering::Monotonic) {
-        MadeChange |= bracketInstWithFences(I, FenceOrdering, IsStore, IsLoad);
+        MadeChange |= bracketInstWithFences(I, FenceOrdering);
       }
     }
 
@@ -320,13 +312,12 @@ bool AtomicExpand::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
   return MadeChange;
 }
 
-bool AtomicExpand::bracketInstWithFences(Instruction *I, AtomicOrdering Order,
-                                         bool IsStore, bool IsLoad) {
+bool AtomicExpand::bracketInstWithFences(Instruction *I, AtomicOrdering Order) {
   IRBuilder<> Builder(I);
 
-  auto LeadingFence = TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, Order, IsStore, IsLoad);
+  auto LeadingFence = TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, I, Order);
 
-  auto TrailingFence = TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, Order, IsStore, IsLoad);
+  auto TrailingFence = TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, I, Order);
   // The trailing fence is emitted before the instruction instead of after
   // because there is no easy way of setting Builder insertion point after
   // an instruction. So we must erase it from the BB, and insert it back
@@ -1048,8 +1039,7 @@ bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI) {
   std::prev(BB->end())->eraseFromParent();
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB);
   if (ShouldInsertFencesForAtomic && UseUnconditionalReleaseBarrier)
-    TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, SuccessOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
-                          /*IsLoad=*/true);
+    TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, CI, SuccessOrder);
   Builder.CreateBr(StartBB);
 
   // Start the main loop block now that we've taken care of the preliminaries.
@@ -1064,8 +1054,7 @@ bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI) {
 
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(ReleasingStoreBB);
   if (ShouldInsertFencesForAtomic && !UseUnconditionalReleaseBarrier)
-    TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, SuccessOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
-                          /*IsLoad=*/true);
+    TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, CI, SuccessOrder);
   Builder.CreateBr(TryStoreBB);
 
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(TryStoreBB);
@@ -1094,8 +1083,7 @@ bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI) {
   // necessary.
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(SuccessBB);
   if (ShouldInsertFencesForAtomic)
-    TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, SuccessOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
-                           /*IsLoad=*/true);
+    TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, CI, SuccessOrder);
   Builder.CreateBr(ExitBB);
 
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(NoStoreBB);
@@ -1107,8 +1095,7 @@ bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI) {
 
   Builder.SetInsertPoint(FailureBB);
   if (ShouldInsertFencesForAtomic)
-    TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, FailureOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
-                           /*IsLoad=*/true);
+    TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, CI, FailureOrder);
   Builder.CreateBr(ExitBB);
 
   // Finally, we have control-flow based knowledge of whether the cmpxchg