Work around a coalescer bug.

The coalescer can in very rare cases leave too large live intervals around after
rematerializing cheap-as-a-move instructions.

Linear scan doesn't really care, but live range splitting gets very confused
when a live range is killed by a ghost instruction.

I will fix this properly in the coalescer after 2.9 branches.

llvm-svn: 127096

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
index 4adf8f7f949..c4ae8c474c5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
@@ -81,7 +81,20 @@ void SplitAnalysis::analyzeUses() {
     UsingBlocks[MBB]++;
   }
   array_pod_sort(UseSlots.begin(), UseSlots.end());
-  calcLiveBlockInfo();
+
+  // Compute per-live block info.
+  if (!calcLiveBlockInfo()) {
+    // FIXME: calcLiveBlockInfo found inconsistencies in the live range.
+    // I am looking at you, SimpleRegisterCoalescing!
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "*** Fixing inconsistent live interval! ***\n");
+    const_cast<LiveIntervals&>(LIS)
+      .shrinkToUses(const_cast<LiveInterval*>(CurLI));
+    LiveBlocks.clear();
+    bool fixed = calcLiveBlockInfo();
+    (void)fixed;
+    assert(fixed && "Couldn't fix broken live interval");
+  }
+
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "  counted "
                << UsingInstrs.size() << " instrs, "
                << UsingBlocks.size() << " blocks.\n");
@@ -89,9 +102,9 @@ void SplitAnalysis::analyzeUses() {
 
 /// calcLiveBlockInfo - Fill the LiveBlocks array with information about blocks
 /// where CurLI is live.
-void SplitAnalysis::calcLiveBlockInfo() {
+bool SplitAnalysis::calcLiveBlockInfo() {
   if (CurLI->empty())
-    return;
+    return true;
 
   LiveInterval::const_iterator LVI = CurLI->begin();
   LiveInterval::const_iterator LVE = CurLI->end();
@@ -154,6 +167,11 @@ void SplitAnalysis::calcLiveBlockInfo() {
     BI.LiveThrough = !hasGap && BI.LiveIn && BI.LiveOut;
     LiveBlocks.push_back(BI);
 
+    // FIXME: This should never happen. The live range stops or starts without a
+    // corresponding use. An earlier pass did something wrong.
+    if (!BI.LiveThrough && !BI.Uses)
+      return false;
+
     // LVI is now at LVE or LVI->end >= Stop.
     if (LVI == LVE)
       break;
@@ -168,6 +186,7 @@ void SplitAnalysis::calcLiveBlockInfo() {
     else
       MFI = LIS.getMBBFromIndex(LVI->start);
   }
+  return true;
 }
 
 bool SplitAnalysis::isOriginalEndpoint(SlotIndex Idx) const {