diff options
author | Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com> | 2019-02-08 20:48:56 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com> | 2019-02-08 20:48:56 +0000 |
commit | 784929d0454c4df6a98ef6fbbd1d30a6f71f9c16 (patch) | |
tree | ee2091fd647c20c3279800a14f7ce36c85b8c00b /llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | |
parent | 0e5dd512aae057aeceb34089c93a380f8edd37da (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-784929d0454c4df6a98ef6fbbd1d30a6f71f9c16.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-784929d0454c4df6a98ef6fbbd1d30a6f71f9c16.zip |
Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp index 0f343f5989f..484dbffefbb 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp @@ -3289,7 +3289,8 @@ void TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint(SDValue Op, switch (ConstraintLetter) { default: break; case 'X': // Allows any operand; labels (basic block) use this. - if (Op.getOpcode() == ISD::BasicBlock) { + if (Op.getOpcode() == ISD::BasicBlock || + Op.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetBlockAddress) { Ops.push_back(Op); return; } @@ -3776,6 +3777,9 @@ void TargetLowering::ComputeConstraintToUse(AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo, return; } + if (Op.getNode() && Op.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetBlockAddress) + return; + // Otherwise, try to resolve it to something we know about by looking at // the actual operand type. if (const char *Repl = LowerXConstraint(OpInfo.ConstraintVT)) { |