diff options
author | Jatin Bhateja <jatin.bhateja@gmail.com> | 2017-10-04 09:02:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jatin Bhateja <jatin.bhateja@gmail.com> | 2017-10-04 09:02:10 +0000 |
commit | 3c29bacd43ffd9bb15eebcf1afc12106806030bd (patch) | |
tree | 10750a4a1a3e12086479b7b0022ca840f332e4ce /llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp | |
parent | ea9dceed777adc46556192a7adc4ae48be1c2113 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-3c29bacd43ffd9bb15eebcf1afc12106806030bd.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-3c29bacd43ffd9bb15eebcf1afc12106806030bd.zip |
[X86] Improvement in CodeGen instruction selection for LEAs (re-applying post required revision changes.)
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp index 15d06871e70..ff8c892c5f9 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/CFG.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/OptimizationDiagnosticInfo.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/FastISel.h" @@ -325,6 +326,8 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None) AU.addRequired<AAResultsWrapperPass>(); AU.addRequired<GCModuleInfo>(); + if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None) + AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); AU.addRequired<StackProtector>(); AU.addPreserved<StackProtector>(); AU.addPreserved<GCModuleInfo>(); @@ -1416,6 +1419,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::SelectAllBasicBlocks(const Function &Fn) { // Iterate over all basic blocks in the function. for (const BasicBlock *LLVMBB : RPOT) { + CurDAG->IsDAGPartOfLoop = false; if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None) { bool AllPredsVisited = true; for (const_pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(LLVMBB), PE = pred_end(LLVMBB); @@ -1593,6 +1597,13 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::SelectAllBasicBlocks(const Function &Fn) { FunctionBasedInstrumentation); } + if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None) { + auto &LIWP = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); + LoopInfo &LI = LIWP.getLoopInfo(); + if (LI.getLoopFor(LLVMBB)) + CurDAG->IsDAGPartOfLoop = true; + } + if (Begin != BI) ++NumDAGBlocks; else |